Search results

:) In the journal thread, I asked Jack to illustrate with a real time example, and proposed QQQ. I also asked why, according to his theory, would people buy a stock at a top area (QQQ was then at 86.65, and the top turned out to be only 0.03 away). He seemed to have disliked that I asked a...

I got back in at 1.5390 area for the short. I have left a take-profit a couple of pips ahead of 1.53, but it did not fill. You did not bet against me, and even if you did, I would rather prefer to lose to you than lose to someone else. :-) I see it went above 1.54, which at least 20 pips...

What you posed is an excellent question. There is one simple way to "cure" what you described.

The trend is the price movement after one enters a trade. If one is losing, then one is against the trend, and if one is winning, then one is with the trend. No one wants to trade against a trend, but the majority do because it is the nature of speculative markets. The definition of the trend I...

If you think what you post works, then start a journal and post in real-time. Do not post any blotter. Just real-time entry and exit.

If something works, it does not need 50 years.

Good luck to you!

It did a funny think at around 44. I am out. Yes, you are right, some strong bars on the 1 min. I was not aware of the rounding thing. Thanks for sharing. I am still bearish on it. I plan to look at where to get back in.:cool:

Did you check EUR/AUD on short side? I liked it at 1.5375. Let us see if it breaks the 1.5352.

I did work in this area. Do you think there would be interest in it?

There is better: big profit factors in shortest time frame! We can experiment it via PM.

Those Japan announcements, in the recent past, have been a passing of air.

What is your price?

Everything is noise, and nothing is noise.

I posted the quotes, because I like the job being done by the authorities. In fact, I believe they may have been somewhat too easy on them, and it would be better if they could cut the easiness by a factor of 10. As for the "brilliant mind", I do not know about that one. In addition, I do not...

"U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said at a press conference that SAC was "a magnet for market cheaters", " "FBI Assistant Director George Venizelos said in a statement, " SAC not only tolerated cheating, it encouraged it." " http://www.cnbc.com/id/100900245

You are not a trader, you are an investor. It is easy to make money as an investor. Trading however is at best a zero sum. Mathematics is profitable to use, and hard to argue with. :cool:

You are all confused about it. If I see one of you get the right answer, I might tell you.

You see, once again, he got it deep up the hole in his lower back.

+1