Search results

Actually, I don't have you on ignore. I have only put 1 person on ignore in my entire period of activity here. I certainly tolerate being questioned or called out as opposed to you. As for the PM, I asked you on Saturday or Sunday about your 'Minimimum 2725' and received a reply then. How is a...

I actually do take pleasure in that. Specifically, one acquaintance of mine. For a day trader and swing trader and any other player than a long term investor, bear markets or at least uncertainty tend to increase volatility which again means more opportunity to make money. So, that's one very...

Agreed. It's @destriero. I assume you have him on ignore, so the post might look a little odd. I have him on ignore also, but for some reason I can see what he writes when I quote him.

@destriero I don't care about your terms and it will never happen that I post a blotter on your request. Basically, what happened here is that you made a bad call and went silent. I jokingly pointed it out and you put me on ignore. Further, I pointed out that instead of posting a random...

I know from the past that B1S2 have taken many short positions in this journal, so it's only now recently I've recognized him as a perma-bull. I found it a little odd actually, since I've known him to play both sides. Any comments, @Buy1Sell2 ? Speaking of perma - anyone know what happened to...

Does he post in real time? I can assure you he uses technical analysis, but probably not the way everone else does it. If someone say they don't use classical TA or that they use 'models' or whatever, it's still TA. Day trading is a matter of technicals. There is no other way. Charts...

@destriero : you need to put me off ignore if you want me to read or reply to your posts where you quote me.

I don't find much interest in other people's P&L, but if @destriero insists on posting, he should post his statement from last Friday when he made his now infamous 'Minimum 2725' call. Still 125 points below and counting...

Not today.

Interesting. I'll be looking up these days later this weekend. Do I understand correctly that trading is not halted, but there's simply a up/down limit for the prices? It seems like for trading to be halted, there has to be a halt in the cash SP500 index...

Why would the market go limit down? When did that happen the last time? Did it happen during the financial crisis? According to my data, we had 3 days with a close less than 7% with maximum down roughly the same since 2005. The biggest at around 9 %. All 3 during the financial crisis. This is...

I was asking if you meant 85 tomorrow, because today it was a very improbable scenario for today.

Statistically, it was unlikely at that point in time. At 33 minutes left - even more so. :)

Tomorrow?

We will not trade above 2661,25 again today. ;)

Gap from Tuesday filled at 37,75.

I liked how you exited your long yesterday recognizing that we had a gap below and thus a good chance of trading lower. If you insist on retaining your long bias, it would be better if you'd repeat what you did that day and recognize that the market in fact goes both ways... :) Seeing how...

Nice catch. :) By the way - my 37,75 target is just a potential target. I'm not calling it today. It's not a probable target at this point in time, but the potential is there. I'm only home for a few minutes and looking at my charts as I have other stuff going on today and haven't made any...

Maybe not. But I have 37,75 as a potential target for today.

You're the one posting garbage here. Just leave the thread already.