Search results

Yes, his blog has no trades, despite his frequent claims that it does. Waste of time to go to his blog.

Zerohedge seems to be a really bad site for analysis; the negative bias they have is atrocious. The numbers you have presented may not be wrong per say but they are slanted to encourage unsound conclusions. Its funny math really. Trade what you feel. Myself, I was pretty clear that I thought...

You dropped 9 points here. Rarely do any of your trades make 9 points. Its telling you something, Nitro. The money is talking to you, but you aren't listening.

AAPL still "Crashing". Oh Dear !!!

It was a severely underpriced stock. So it had to correct up. This is not unusual, I've seen similar moves in companies like IBM in the past. Express the AAPL move as a pct and its nothing extraordinary really after a boffo earnings report. This is something people trading indexes have to...

Update on Yellow Media ( YLO ), one of the highest yielding stocks on the TSX until they cut their dividend late last year. Price one year ago : $6.01 Price two years ago : $5.43 Price today : $0.125

Sound familiar ? When will March 2009 lows be breached ? 19 months later and where is this "more pronounced downturn" ? What were those tops in August 2010 that you called in SPX and many commodities ? How far has the US$ rallied from then ? We need to drop one hell of a long way for this...

Counterpoint, Grand_Super_Cycle thinks that US markets are going to break 2008/2009 lows this year. So we have you predicting a 35% further rise in markets ( if you are serious I'm not sure ), and he's predicting a 55% drop. That's quite a range !!! I look at it differently. I'd rather own...

I was referring to this post : I'm not sure why "Jan" was chosen in this post, but it fooled me. Wouldn't have changed my recommendation to exit the position though, especially because the gain/loss might have been fairly negligible at the time.

You always look for complicated answers to simple situations. AAPL made tons of money, because they have no real debt and don't really need to pay an enormous r&d budget right now, most of the money simply increases the value of the company. So the shares must go up, because they are worth...

( Should be Feb 18s ??? ) Most of the P/L numbers on this thread are wrong then. The 0.26 post say "JAN" calls ??? I understand why I overlooked this, given that JAN wasn't relevant. Typo ??? Or more jokes ???

AAPL "Crash" continues. Oh Dear !!!

What is the point about posting bs "corrections" on real events that are public domain ? Bottom line is, in the past two months you've recommended the worst two trades on this site.

Its a good lesson on options trading and how some posters on here ( like ForexForex ) are totally clueless. It doesn't matter if its real or not. 90% of the posted trades on this site ARE NOT REAL. For example, I stated the trade could lose $350,000 and recommended covering at a $13,000 loss...

Many Gold bugs invest in it like a religon. It doesn't mean you won't make lots of money but today's market in metals reminds me of the early to mid 1990s. The downside to picking Gold is its not really a fundamental play. If enough people ever bail on the trade it can get ugly very fast. I...

My post from the AAPL Crash thread : Your whole act is pointless and ignorant. You seem to think by getting hysterical and recruiting fellow whack jobs on internet ( read your "psychologist" here ), you'll garner some support from your baseless and irrational point of view. Some things are...

Your whole act is pointless and ignorant. You seem to think by getting hysterical and recruiting fellow whack jobs on internet ( read your "psychologist" here ), you'll garner some support from your baseless and irrational point of view. Some things are very clear. Your communication skills...

Ok, so the summary of what you are saying is the stock is $495 and you think it can go to $700 or $300. I don't see an edge. In fact, I think the likelihood of it going to $700 is much higher then it going to $300, but that is just my opinion based on forward P/E.

It only has to meet projected earnings for one year and maintain that level to be a cheap stock.

You know, I do like when you put the posts side by side because it helps illustrate just how irrational and full of bs you are. So you are claiming an "AAPL Crash" thread has nothing to do with a short call ? Well, what the hell is it then Sherlock ? We all know what it is. Its purposeful...