Search results

Gain of 1.3/share marketable.

Margins 3X better than CIG. ;)

Long APE/short AMC synthetic is up 0.8 from Friday to date.

haha Starship Troopers reference.

Gosar sounds nice... https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/paul-gosar-newsletter-antisemtic-racist-pro-hitler-website-links-1234794315/

Hey Bro, WWII is over!

The PNL figure is the cost basis on AMC (post share-conversion) of 2.27 less the (option conversion arb) proceeds for a gain of 1.4/share pre split. This does not include the sweetener nor any issues with completion. You cannot gain > 1.4 (excluding sweetener) due to the share-conversion and the...

Were you accurate? You hangry?

Objective: realized loss, achieved!

A bridge too far, dipsht.

@globalarbtrader is full semi-auto.

Retail js an advantage outside of information. No capacity constraints. RAES routing if it's still a thing.

Open your mind to subjectivity. Don't be a hater.

Don't listen to new, he's a degen with 7-figure daily swings.

You don't understand layers and programmatic-dynamic hedges.

What I meant was it's all that I was willing to show. In the "dest everything journal" showed that most of my trades were in single name positions (L/S shares) with an eventual option-add or cover. Too difficult to convey here due to frequency.

lol define premise you tool.

I asked you if you can trade 400 with $160K and you cannot. 400 would require a net liq over $160K therefore the $100K net liq qualifier kicks in (double the req). You implied I teed it up for you and then you provided the proof of you failure.

You do stupid really well. Kudos, ser. Note: Day Trading margins are twice the displayed amount for account balances exceeding $100K And I would bet my net liq that nobody has B/S 400 ES at AMP with a net liq of <$321K. lol.