Search results

92.51

Hitler didn't want to kill commies, he wanted to kill Stalin. There is a difference.

Yeah I agree, if we confirm on the monthly we will hit that 145 level pretty soon.

Once again we have narrow tight pivots coming into tomorrow in Gold, Copper and Crude Oil. Crude confirmed a monthly A up today adding to the weekly A up and sitting right back at the QTR A up. Based on the strength in the number line, Oil looks like it could really run. Very tight pivot...

Bonds are not failing yet. We closed below the monthly. I have an option position and I'm short the front month puts against the back. I'm fine for now. Have a lot of room to work with here. Bonds are definitely not upticking with the same velocity as they were before when spoos were coming in.

Surf 1 Sam 0

Wrong Maverick. LOL.

I'm short pretty big size in Bonds off that QTR level. Best trade I've had in a year so far. Knock on wood.

Yes.

Yes, also a failed weekly A up at 1405.75. Intra-day A up at 1401.75. So yeah, you got a tri-fecta there.

Actual high was 1403.25! That's what I call precision. :)

Matthew, yes, I use my own version of ACD but at it's core, it's the same methodology Fisher uses. I simply have expanded on Fisher's work to include more macro levels. How you trade it is up to you. It's still a methodology based on price, time and volatility.

See, I agree with you that both sides do it. Never said anything to the contrary. My question was why do "you" do it? Again, this is a message board. There really are no rules per se. But if you willingly wish to have a discussion with someone, there has to be back and forth. And don't try...

That's a cop out and you know it. So let me "try" to ask you something. Do you think it's fair that Romney ignores questions from the media. What keeps him from pulling a "gabby" where he says that's a stupid question and won't answer it? See, if that is the new standard then everyone can...

Do you even notice how you never address anyone's question? You know who you act like? Michelle Bachmann. It's like you're reading off of a script. I ask a question and you keep on with your talking points. It's annoying when she does it and it's annoying when you do it. You don't have to...

No. You simply agree with anyone that spouts something from the left and disagree with anyone that spouts something from the right. Don't you have the ability to think for yourself instead of being a ditto head?

You know that is not true. Case in point. During the 8 years Reagan was in office, was the right more angry or the left? During the 8 years Bush was in office, was the right more angry or the left? During Obama's 3 years in office, was the left more angry or the right? I know you are...

Don't try to be logical with Brass. You are either with him or against him. Case in point, a few months back when you were attacking the righties, you were with him and he was your friend. Now that you question the left, he sees you as against him. His shallowness is very transparent.

Yes, that's what I asked you. Are you saying there are NO angry people on the left on ET? Do you read the P&R forum? LOL. Edit: I'm sorry, I asked you a question again. I keep doing that. LOL.

And there are NO angry people on the left? LOL. I guess you are not striving for credibility here. That's OK. Like Captain said, I never thought angry was the definition of extreme. Have you ever been to a liberal protest before? I actually have. Angry does not even begin to describe...