Search results

Yet more evidence that piehole works for a libertarian think tank. If anyone wants to know what Shaviv is really all about.... https://www.desmogblog.com/nir-shaviv And still, not a single example of a publishing climate scientist denying man made globa warming. "He (Shaviv) does stress...

Yes, I know what they say. They say it is a greenhouse that - on balance - warms and without it the earth would be much much colder. Or do you deny that also, you lying piece of shit.

NASA says it's a greenhouse gas, that warms. Or are you trying to re-define what "greenhouse gas" means? You, like piehole, are one of those lying scumbags. The kind that will help cause death and destruction from man made global warming. Go fuck yourself.

My problem is that I hate scumbags that lie for profit or ideology when those lies will cause death and destruction. Scumbag. I guess you won't answer my question.

No, NASA says it's a greenhouse gas, that warms. Or are you trying to re-define what "greenhouse gas" means?

Is CO2 a greenhouse gas or not.

The 5 telltale techniques of climate change denial 1. Fake experts Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that humans are causing global warming. This has been found independently in a number of studies, including surveys of Earth scientists, analysis of public statements about...

^Think tank "social media outreach" operator in action. Salby? LOL. No he is NOT a highly respected climate scientist, he's a laughing stock. Again with the ad-homing the argument. It's climate science, not the Hansen hypothesis.

No you would NOT find one, let alone a list. NO publishing climate scientist explictly denies man made global warming. I mean denies, not casts doubt on or questions the degree of etc..... It should be easy to find one, he or she would stick out like a sore thumb. Contrast that with the fact...

Tell you what. Find us ONE publishing climate scientist that denies man made global warming. I mean denies, not casts doubt on or questions the degree of etc..... there are none. Whereas, when asked, over 97% of publishing climate scientists, all the world's science orgs, Exxon, The...

Piehole said above "If you look the scientists that are well qualified to question Hansen's Hypothesis up on Google, you will find that they have all been subjected to relentless attack. It's part of the smear campaign waged against any scientist who questions the validity Hansen's Hypothesis."...

More evidence that piezoe works for a think tank..... He said......"The consensus seems to be building that there is some warming occurring globally. But even that is undecided. Some portions of the Earth are clearly warming while others may be cooling." Oh really... lol....classic climate...

Well you could go by the opinions of politicians and internet experts. Or you could go by the opinion of actual experts..... https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/ Just to sample the above .....and reiterate that virtually no publishing climate scientist agrees with piezoe's...

So much fluff and bullshit in this post that it is difficult to shovel it all. Let's start with the first paragraph. "There are many factors that must be taken into account. The truth is that CO2 is a relatively weak absorber of IR and it is present in only trace amounts. it operates in one...

Well the nut doesn't fall far from the tree.

Secret funding helped build vast network of climate denial thinktanks Anonymous billionaires donated $120m to more than 100 anti-climate groups working to discredit climate change science https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/feb/14/funding-climate-change-denial-thinktanks-network

I'll repeat this one for the sake of jerm and piehole who for some reason still don't get it. Is there a reliable way to identify CO2’s influence on temperatures over that period? There is: we can measure the wavelengths of long-wave radiation leaving the Earth (upward radiation). Satellites...

The effect of adding man-made CO2 is predicted in the theory of greenhouse gases. This theory was first proposed by Swedish scientist Svante Arrhenius in 1896, based on earlier work by Fourier and Tyndall. Many scientist have refined the theory in the last century. Nearly all have reached the...

It's not undersea volcanoes like the deranged liar jerm or any of the total bullshit that piehole the libertarian think tank operator, spewed out above. it's this....CO2....earth's most important greenhouse gas. It must be too obvious for them.

And you would know about demented trolls.