Search results

So, they are only meteorologists, not climatologists. Also proves blind adherence to right wing ideology is present in weathermen as well as forum trolls. There is little reason to think weathermen would think much differently than the general public on the issue. They are not...

So why does it stop at 1960? Regardless, that was not the world's atmospheric levels of CO2. The chart is wrong. Compare that crap chart with this accurate one and tell me which one makes sense.

Doesn't matter. Today we are rapidly increasing the temps and they are higher than they were during the MWP. Can you read a chart? The recent rise is too new to make a big change in climate or melt Greenland's ice and the ocean currents may have been different. The current rise is also...

No. You are wrong.

There is a massive amount showing it. You are just too stupid and crazed to see it. American Chemical Society "Comprehensive scientific assessments of our current and potential future climates clearly indicate that climate change is real, largely attributable to emissions from human...

Why does it stop at 1960? I'll tell you why. Because it's just more denialist bullshit. This is the real deal.

Yes, Republicans are so incredibly stupid that they don't understand that raising greenhouse gasses by 40% will result in warming.

Bullshit crap chart not up to date. Try again.

Nice bullshit chart fhl. Means nothing and certainly not what you think it does. The number of record temps is dependent on the previous records. Once they are set they don't easily get broken again. But you and your denier moron friends and Republicans don't understand that. The...

Oh and jerm, that paper is just more crappy science and isn't worth the paper it's not printed on. Debunked bullshit again. All you have is crap science and Al Roker wannabe whores...

Here is some of the proof that CO2 leads temps higher.

And still you keep referring to that Al Roker wannabe Watts. CO2 is proven to lead temps higher. No doubt about it.

Jem you ignorant douchebag. Of course CO2 leads temperatures. Because it is a greenhouse gas. What the fuck is wrong with you? Rising CO2 leads temperatures higher. Always has, always will.

Chart is wrong.

jem you ignorant troll. Do you understand anything to do with science at all? You keep flinging shit. Your aim sucks and your ammo smells. Maybe this will jar something within the fetid inner recess of what you call a brain.

No lag now. Because CO2 is now the forcer not the Malankovitch cycles. This is solid evidence that CO2 lead temperatures higher. Jem, Anthony Watts is a hack and a prostitute. He used to be a TV meteorologist. Like Al Roker. Maybe you like to get your science from Al Roker...

Figure 1: CO2 levels (parts per million) over the past 10,000 years. Blue line from Taylor Dome ice cores (NOAA). Green line from Law Dome ice core (CDIAC). Red line from direct measurements at Mauna Loa, Hawaii (NOAA).

These pathetic attempts to disprove the facts are just that, pathetic. Multiple studies by multiple authors show that it's 97%. http://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-scientific-consensus-advanced.htm

Yeah right troll. Science is over my head. But yet I have a degree in it and you consistently show that you don't understand the science with nearly every post you make. You still don't understand the simple fact that man has increased the greenhouse gas by 40% resulting in a warming earth...

Ummmm.....whatever. The fact remains that CO2 has gone up 40% over the last two hundred years due to fossil fuel burning. But of course you're just throwing shit out there and hope it sticks to something. Check your shoes because your aim sucks and your ammo smells.