Search results

Welcome to ET kid, and I wish you luck. You're going to need it around here.

I basically agree but....some things need to be done at a federal level. The EPA is one of them. Pollution does not stop at state lines and there needs to be a coherent nationwide policy. "I understand wealth distribution differently, the 1% control the wealth because they are writing all...

This is the temperature of the earth. The atmospheric temperatures are just measures of the temperature of the air which is only 3% of the earth's heat. This is the measure of 94 %. I have pointed this out to jerm multiple times and if he was at all intellectually honest he would agree...

First of all, to simply say that global warming has stopped 17 years ago is wrong. Period. The earth continues to rapidly gain heat. Second, even if one were to say the atmosphere has stopped warming 17 years ago it is, if not outright wrong, is essentially meaningless given the overall...

Good comments. I just want to add a few things that were not talked about enough IMO. First off....it is not the end of the US. The US is still the greatest nation on earth and will be for quite some. Reports of it's death are just hysterics and not rooted in reality. Some folks need to...

I stopped at "global warming stopped 17 years ago". As soon as I see that I know the author is either stupid or a liar or both and to read further is a waste of time.

Solar was increasing until about 1970. Since then it has been declining while temps continue to rise. Aside from the eleven year cycles there not much that can be predicted as far as solar as far as I know.

But we don't know what their definition really is do we? That's because they don't want us to know because the definition is absurdly narrow. Yes the science is more important than surveys. Too bad you refuse to really understand that CO2 in balance warms the lower atmosphere and that 97%...

Well, that wasn't too bad but you missed some very essential things..... 1. Yes, agnotology is what you and Watts a dozen other Koch bros funded websites and the Heritage Foundation do..... Agnotology (formerly agnatology) is the study of culturally induced ignorance or doubt...

What? That makes no sense. I can believe that it is possible that Cook may have misattributed some, however the authors were also asked point blank and still, 97% agreed. So your deflection is, once again irrelevant to the greater truth. Once again, you are allowing a propaganda website...

No they did not. The true experts (not the media monkeys) said it would take many months of study to say with any confidence what role GW played and even then that can only be given in terms of probability. But one thing that is absolutely certain is that every weather system on earth is now...

excerpt from above ; Among those respondents with climate expertise who have published their climate research, this survey found that 93 percent agreed that humans have contributed significantly to global warming over the past 150 years

So in your own words, can you explain the above in a few sentences? I mean, you were/are a lawyer so I assume your reading comprehension is pretty good. Can you tell us what this means?

So what? They are partisan and not qualified. You may as well ask a group of musicians about it. Just more total bullshit from you. Will you ever get a clue?

More bullshit from jerm. " Cook had not considered whether scientists and their published papers had said climate change was “dangerous”." So what?! Who cares if they didn't say "It was dangerous" ? What a ludicrous and immaterial criteria! The fact is that 97% of climate scientist...

How do meteorologists fit into the 97% global warming consensus? A new study examines meteorologists, the global warming consensus, political ideology, and climate expertise Meteorologists' positions on climate science are most determined by their acceptance of the expert consensus and their...

gwb....you are very confused and deluded and dumb Here's what NASA says...... Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities,1and most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have...

So what? Your factoid is as irrelevant as you are. Man is causing the earth to warm by emitting huge quantities of the greenhouse gas CO2. There is no doubt about it. 97% of all the world's climate scientists and all of it's science organizations, including NASA, are in agreement on this fact.

LOL, yeah, it all started back in 1850 when John Tyndall "proved" that CO2 is a greenhouse gas. Then it continued when the thousands of temperature and CO2 measurements using multiple methods "showed" the CO2 and temps rapidly rising, conveniently right when man started dumping billions of tons...

NASA says CO2 is a greenhouse gas. It heats the lower atmosphere. That's what NASA says. NASA and NOAA say the hockey stick temp chart is real. They say man has increased CO2 by 40%. The rest of the irrelevant BS you posted is just noise.