Search results

And yet it is you who displays shocking levels of stupidity and incomprehension of basic science. While not crazy, you are certainly stupid.

No, really. He's fucking crazy.

What part of "CO2 IS A GREENHOUSE GAS" ..do you not understand?

This is so totally fucking wrong and you are so delusional it's actually funny. Do you ever seriously think about what you write? Do you actually believe this shit? You are batshit crazy.

It already has. CO2 is a very important greenhouse gas and we raised levels 40%. Why this simple science is still in question by you and your fellow denialists is a mystery. How can temperatures NOT rise given these facts? The facts on this chart are correct.

Never in the past was the CO2 levels raised 40% in two hundred years. That's a blink of an eye. So looking at past climate is of limited value with regards to understanding the current situation and is an irrelevant deflection. Man is releasing 9 billion tons of carbon into the air every year...

A picture is worth a thousand words.

Well I see the problem here then. You refuse to recognize the most basic facts. You are trying to argue the CO2 is NOT a greenhouse gas. That is like arguing that water doesn't freeze. You are simply ignorant and delusional with a side of crazy. It's as pointless arguing with you as it is...

Yes, I understand. Your brand of Christianity means everyone for themselves and saying to hell with the poor. I know how you view Christianity. You think, in your warped, cynical, fucked-up way that the best Christians on earth are frauds and two-faced. You think doing what Jesus would do is...

He won't answer because he is a coward and he knows I will trap him in a logical argument from which he cannot escape.

But the very structure of governmental regulations or lack thereof essentially acts as a decree, one that increasingly favors the wealthy. With this wealth there is now, more than ever, power over our government. It feeds on itself. Plutocracy being the danger. One way redistribution for...

Good questions. I would say let the public decide but then there is the danger of tyranny by the masses isn't there? But yet, the public must decide, just as we have done all along. Ultimately, fairness, better/worse is determined by the majority. But that majority may be fooled by a...

\ Trickle down?

BTW. gwb, you never answered me you intellectually dishonest coward. Is the CO2 man emits a greenhouse gas?

Nonsense? It's the truth! WTF is wrong with you? You don't believe that virtually every science organization in the world agrees? And that there are NONE who dispute it? Or that every way to reasonably look at it that 97% of climate scientists agree with man made global warming...

Good point, but all we need is adjustment of what we have now. No? No need to get radical. We already redistribute wealth, and for good reason.

So everyone agrees that the current, historically high levels of wealth inequality is bad for ethical, economic and political reasons. Right?

It's a NASA website with NASA science. That's why it comes up on an internal search on NASA.gov. Regardless, the information on it is absolutely correct. This is the information. Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends over the past century are...

One doesn't even know where to start with that mess.

One more time dipstick, it's a freakin NASA website. Same science asshole. If one types GW consensus on the main NASA site this is what one gets. Note, they are ALL NASA sites because it is a fucking internal search function you total moron. Climate Change: Consensus...