Search results

Instead of figuring how to get around as suggested above, maybe you should grasp the purpose of these requirements. With $5K, you will almost be guaranteed to lose it. There are very very few people who made a hobby/living off a $5K account. usually, you will be donating your money to others.

Basically as he said above, the same advice to all others. You are a PUBLISHER of information - giving your understanding and opinion. You are not a financial advisor who knows anything about the financial goals or assets of any of your subscribers.

Read David Aronson's "Evidence" book on TA. There are others, but it does not give a favorable light on using classic TA stuff...

some makes sense, some is naive.

Your chance of finding financial freedom are tiny You will soon find that being employed longterm is better than being unemployed longterm Can you try to go "part time" for less money? You got vacation you could take? Can you request a short term leave, to refresh? Look for another...

unless day trading, these are a major mistake. Do a google search on what happens with these when held for any length of time.

lots of threads like this on ET. Do some research and read them... In summary, this will likely take far more time, far more money, far more energy than you can ever imagine, and your chances of longterm wealth are probably less than 0.5%. Also, most of the people who respond to you would...

Journals section?? You can do whatever you want there.

Google Logic translator Applied:

:D

much of value in this post. Treatment is always the cart; being active, avoiding stuff like cigarettes and eating properly is the horse.

That seems very common to your posts.

You tote it to a reasonably clear (dark) site, assemble it, voila. A dobsonian, is basically a reflector, without a tripod. As for seeing, depends on how dark it is, etc. It has a 20" mirror, so it is an order of magnitude light-gathering ability over what most people own.

You need to look up the term hijack. Apparently you banged your forehead typing in while confusing "opinion" with "proven" or "evidence." Baseless- would like to see you demonstrate this, as the only thing baseless is your entire set of assertions.

The problem is, most of these people have no clue. So interacting with them or ask about proposed trade ideas with such is equivalent to talking to the mirror...

a cheap, scanned-in paper prediction for it to nearly triple. Nothing like reliable sources :D

The difference is, what I said was true. That you don't accept it is because you dislike the truth. Now, I have a feeling you (again) are hiding behind an alias.

This article is a reasonably well developed treatise on acupuncture, including current studies, etc. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acupuncture Putting out one study has little meaning - there are many, only considering all current knowledge as a whole is an objective and meaningful way to...

this is the model of my scope - 20" mirror Dobsonian (Obsession)