Search results

He is saying it is not a proxy because it is not. It's a direct measurement of captured air. I say that it's indisputable that CO2 has gone up 40% over the last two hundred years due to man's burning or fossil fuels. But of course you deny this simple fact because you are a crazed...

\ This is how much man has caused global warming...right here

Well done stu. And as I said before and piezoe agrees, it's something of a red herring anyway because it does not change the fact that CO2 has gone up 40% over the last two hundred years concurrent with the ind rev. The more recent proxies all mesh well with the ice records.

No, CO2 does not cool, it is a greenhouse gas, and it does not act like a thermostat and the earth has warmed rapidly over the last 17 years. You are a very confused and ignorant person.

American Meteorological Society "It is clear from extensive scientific evidence that the dominant cause of the rapid change in climate of the past half century is human-induced increases in the amount of atmospheric greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide (CO2)...

American Geophysical Union "The Earth's climate is now clearly out of balance and is warming. Many components of the climate system — including the temperatures of the atmosphere, land and ocean, the extent of sea ice and mountain glaciers, the sea level, the distribution of precipitation...

OK, since you like it so much and it's true, here it is again CO2 does not cause cooling in the part of the atmosphere we are interested in. It causes warming of the troposphere and cooling of the stratosphere. We don't live in the stratosphere. This is basic science which you still...

The idea that essentially every science organization in the world (with NONE disagreeing) and Exxon and The Weather Channel and BP and NOAA and NASA and Japanese Met Agency and The Met Office agrees, but somehow only 50% or 0.3% of climatologists do also, is absurd on the face of it and an idea...

Jem, THIS is what NASA says...... Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities,1and most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The...

You're joking right? We raise CO2 by 40%. CO2 is strong greenhouse gas. And you aren't sure what's making the temperatures go up? And here I thought you were an intelligent guy. Guess not. And Salby is barely worth talking about except as an example of a hack scientist.

I just did that. You need to read my previous posts. You seem to be blind and ignorant to the obvious.

No CO2 does not cause cooling in the part of the atmosphere we are interested in. It causes warming of the troposphere and cooling of the stratosphere. We don't live in the stratosphere. This is basic science which you still don't understand. Your ignorance is astounding.

I guess you have missed the previous 20 posts wherein piezoe and I start with the science showing the physical properties of CO2 and go from there. Hmmm. I wonder why you missed it? Troll.

But of course you know the earth as a whole has continued to warm unabated over that time period. Good. You are learning ............troll.

Yeah OK, you are half right and half wrong above but every science organization on earth, along with Exxon believe man's release of greenhouse gasses has caused the temps to rapidly rise beyond any natural cause. Do you want me to start quoting all the AGW position statements of all the...

I guess this doesn't matter then. LOL

But none of Salby's work, regardless of merit, changes the fact that CO2 levels have gone up some 40% over the last 200 years, concurrent with the industrial revolution and man's burning of FF's. A smooth line can drawn back via various proxies and they mesh right into the ice CO2 levels of...

Anderegg 2010 This overwhelming consensus among climate experts is confirmed by an independent study that surveys all climate scientists who have publicly signed declarations supporting or rejecting the consensus. They find between 97% to 98% of climate experts support the consensus (Anderegg...

So how much money did you send Lucrum? LOL .... just kidding.

"Cook had not considered whether scientists and their published papers had said climate change was “dangerous”." Nor did he bother asking if the price in tea in China is rising which has about as much relevance. Do you think everyone is as stupid as you are and consider this trash...