Search results

Good analogy. But what if it was a Republican's greenhouse?

1. You're assuming scientists are as ignorant as you are. They are not, 2. They know how much a certain level of CO2 forces warming. It's measured by watts per square meter. It's not just me "preaching it as fact" , it's also every sci org in the world. And then there is that...

Wow, I wonder if NASA knows about this?! I'm sure if they did they would learn to deny that AGW is real !! Just like you!! Coolllll!!

This is why it is a POS propaganda piece. Nevermind the Al Gore red herring. This is the essential truth, not that there was a blip upward on the downward path. I hope all the lines don't confuse you

OK< I'll go slowly. There is no other explanation that fits and regardless, increasing CO2 levels increase forcing.

So you never answered my question. Is the CO2 released by man a greenhouse gas? I'll uphold my end and say, yes CO2 can cool the atmosphere.

What a piece of shit propaganda piece that article is.

And year over year which these idiots don't understand what that means.

But when we know CO2 is a greenhouse gas along with some other information the conclusion is obvious to anyone with more half a brain. You DO know CO2 is a greenhouse has right. I really don't think you idiots know what that means.

It's just a chart showing CO2 leading temperatures higher. I don't why you are having a fit

Good post stu. That clears up the hologram thing for me a bit. But if it's a hologram then it must be from a computer and computers are designed and if they are designed then there must be designer and he must be God. That's all jem was trying to say :). One of these days I must dive back...

EVERY SCIENCE ORGANIZATION IN THE WORLD EXXON BP THE WEATHER CHANNEL NOAA NASA THE MET OFFICE The science is clear, overwhelming and obvious. Man's release of greenhouse gasses - mostly CO2 - has increased the greenhouse effect of earth's atmosphere which has caused heating...

OK. You win. Here is the science showing CO2 leads temps higher. Now you can't say I did not show you the science.

Oh, and it's 97% not .3% The Geological Society of America "The Geological Society of America (GSA) concurs with assessments by the National Academies of Science (2005), the National Research Council (2006), and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2007) that global...

jem, you bore me. But since you still seem very confused on how the greenhouse effect works and you don't understand words.

There is no lag. CO2 and temps rise essentially rise simultaneously when CO2 is the driving factor. You know why?

I'll tell you what I'll answer if you answer. OK?

So you never answered my question. Is the CO2 released by man a greenhouse gas?

No he doesn't. The Koch bros say so.

CO2 clearly leads temps as expected because...say it with me jem.....CO2 IS A GREENHOUSE GAS