Search results

Bares repeating... I’ve owned up to the danger. Why haven’t other conservatives? They are captives, first and foremost, of the fossil fuel industry, which outspent green groups 10 to 1 in lobbying on climate change from 2000 to 2016. But they are also captives of their own rigid ideology. It is...

If Krugman had all of his brain removed, he would still be smarter than every Republican in the US. That's why they hate him. Too smart. This bares repeating... And let’s be clear: While Donald Trump is a prime example of the depravity of climate denial, this is an issue on which his whole...

You really can't fucking read can you. from a publishing climate scientist denying man made global warming The consensus is 100% among the experts. Non of the industry whores and fools you listed deny that man made global warming is true. It's not 97%, it's 100% consensus.

Here’s what happens when you try to replicate climate contrarian papers A new paper finds common errors among the 3% of climate papers that reject the global warming consensus Dana Nuccitelli Tue 25 Aug 2015 06.00 EDTLast modified on Wed 14 Feb 2018 12.30 EST Shares 41,239 Comments 1,364...

The Trump administration is, it goes without saying, deeply anti-science. In fact, it’s anti-objective reality. But its control of the government remains limited; it didn’t extend far enough to prevent the release of the latest National Climate Assessment, which details current and expected...

You really can't fucking read can you. from a publishing climate scientist denying or even questioning the basic truth of man made global warming The consensus is 100% among the experts.

Yes jem, you are a lying sack of shit with zero intellectual honesty. Again with bullshit time period and the bullshit cherry picked spot. Liars like you use "thenotrickzone" because it's a trick. Used by misinformers like you, liar. It's a bullshit site paid for by the fossil fuel...

Piehole. What are you, also fucking stupid and can't comprehend what you read? still, not a single quote from a publishing climate scientist denying or even questioning the basic truth of man made global warming. because the consensus is not 97% its 100%...

What are you, fucking stupid and can't comprehend what you read? still, not a single quote from a publishing climate scientist denying or even questioning the basic truth of man made global warming. Come on, that one would stand out like sore thumb. because the consensus is not 97% its...

still, not a single quote from a publishing climate scientist denying or even questioning the basic truth of man made global warming. because the consensus is not 97% its 100% oh, and shut the fuck up jem

Oh shut the fuck up jem you liar with the bullshit irrelevant time scale chart. You lying sack of shit.

Again, another denier idiot that doesn't know the difference between climate and weather. As moronic as Trump.

That leaves you out. You are the stupidest "scientist", that I have ever seen. My dog has more common sense logic. So you acknowledge that no publishing climate scientist denies man made global warming and the consensus is actually 100% What's the matter? Can't find a single quote/paper...

"The water levels haven't changed. Despite the gloom and doom threat of global warming that democrats have been spouting for the last 30 years. The whole coast was suppose to be underwater by 2010." No they never said that. Moron idiot deniers may THINK they said that because they watch Fox...

"Most sea turtles migrate between areas where they can find food and areas where they can give birth, and typically to warmer waters, according to SEE Turtles, a conservation tourism project that aims to protect sea turtles. Prescott told CNN he attributes the deaths of the turtles to global...

Thanks for reconfirming that deniers are morons (like Trump) and don't know the difference between weather and climate. Thank you for proving how dumb you - and conservatives in general - are. It's like, they keep saying this stupid stuff, they know it's stupid, but they say it anyway.

still, not a single quote from a publishing climate scientist denying or even questioning the basic truth of man made global warming. because the consensus is not 97% its 100% oh, and shut the fuck up jem

What consensus are you talking about? I think you'll be close to correct, I would think there probably is a close to 100% consensus on that!. But what would be the point? There is much new information freely available to you. You're making statements that make no sense. You have acquired...

What post? He said nothing. Once again. Not a single fact or link to an authoritative source. In short piehole is completely full of shit.