Search results

Predating what discoveries? Are you trying to suggest at any time in his professional life, Steven Weinberg did not know an expanding universe indicates a non zero cosmological constant? How naive and uninformed you are. Now why don't you listen properly to that vid starting 3mins 40secs...

a. Non scientific b. scientific c. you are such a clown

"There are some things that are quite mysterious in our understanding of nature as we know it now. There is a constant called the "cosmological constant", which if I didn't know anything I would make an estimate of what its magnitude would be just on the basis of guess work from what I know...

Why don't you think (for once) what would happen to the universe if due to the fundamental laws of physics, the cosmological constant could not be any other value than it is.

Pointless yes, but with his god awful posts making such bad train wrecks, one just has to take a look when going past. :D

How little you obviously understand yet presume to comprehend. Various supersymmetry theories require the cosmological constant to be at precisely zero. I also explained thoroughly to you in the context of differences between Susskind and Einstein, why you are wrong . All you can do is...

...where Susskind is saying multiverse. duh. Well if I had to be stuck anywhere I'd prefer it to be the 1950s rather than like you, in the middle ages. The fact that Einstein has the cosmological constant as an arbitrary constant with a value of 0 in his equations of general relativity to...

In that case fine tuning is worse than conjecture, as there is no science that shows the universe IS fine tuned. At least multiverse complies with the laws of physics and is based on science rather than faith.

Albert Einstein, not me, had the cosmological constant at zero. He coined the term and did the field equations for it. But hey, thanks for the compliment.

ok then, as you say, multiverse IS the science. But there is no science that shows the universe IS fine tuned.

There is no science that shows the universe IS fine tuned.

There is no science that shows the universe IS fine tuned, so nothing to lie about. Scientists say multiverse, so again nothing there to lie about. The fine tuning you mean is not science anyway.

Fine. So what the hell is your beef. You're "following the science" aren't you. Isn't that what you said. The only science Susskind explains says multiverse. Which btw wouldn't explain this one as finely tuned, but rather it disposes of any so called fine tuning argument. Just like not...

Try again. Here I'll help you.... Susskind has dismissed the fine tuning you mean in his book. He says it is an illusion. The fine tuning you mean, the one that includes a "Tuner"/creator/god, is not in science because it is religion. Hope that helps.

You're getting hysterical again. Susskind has dismissed the fine tuning you mean in his book. He says it is an illusion. And there is non of it in science because it is religion, not science.

Flaky vids chopped and edited to Mars and back won't cut it. The fine tuning you mean, just doesn't exist in any science. Because it isn't science.

No you haven't. Deluded yourself more like, into believing you have provided video or links with top scientists showing you cosmological constant is "tuned" to 120 decimal places. But actually, you haven't. Next you'll be claiming pi is tuned to infinite places.

"The Bible is the word of God". "The Bible is the word from God." Generally speaking it's blindingly obvious for Christians the bible is both the word 'of' and 'from' God. Any very simple sentence that can have any meaning you want it to depending on how you want to interpret it...means it...

...and so you don't have an argument. No scientist has any science to confirm the constants of the universe are amazingly tuned for life. Maybe your universe, the one in which Elvis lives they do, but the real one - they don't. Tuner/Creator/God: No science, non-scientific and contrary...

Christians claim the Bible is the word of god. That is what has always and is broadly understood to be the general view of christians. Are you seriously trying to say christians in general do not think the Bible is the word of god? A symbiotic relationship between man the author and god...