Search results

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-426418,00.html

More of that dastardley evil Zionist propaganda: http://www.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/meast/09/22/israel.bombing.donor.ap/

TF2000, this is the umpteenth time that you have insulted me. I have not said anything to you about this until now (while others have). Please refrain from personal insults (that is the policy of the board). Thank you.

OHLC, you are twisting what I've said and what the US did. First, the US (NATO) did not attack civilians. It attacked the Milosovic machinery of evil. Unfortunately some innocent lives were lost. That is the hard and sad fact of war (bombs don't recognize innocence). Contrary to what...

OHLC, somehow I don't think you would be saying that if you were one of the thousands that were saved from concentration camps as a result of the removal of Milosovic from power by the US bombing. But hey, to each his own! If you think stoping a genocidal maniac is terrorism then we...

TF2000, if you are ignorant of recent history as it pertains to the war in Yugoslavia it isn't my fault. The UN was on the ground as 'peace keepers'. However, there was no peace. Finally, NATO attacked (bombed) Milosovic's military until he stopped killing innocent civilians. Then he was...

Candle, When the US (and Canada - NATO) unilaterally attacked Yugoslavia to stop Milosovic, without the backing of the UN, was that international terrorism? If so, would you please explain that to the thousands of innocent civilians that were saved from genocide (or as Milosovic likes to...

Ritter was on CNN in mid Sept (with Aaron Brown) and he said that he believed Iraq to have WMD and was for inspections. He then said if they are not allowed or if they find WMD Saddam should be removed. In my book this guy has changed his mind so many times (right on national TV) that he is...

TF2000, I have no doubt that in the face of any and all evidence there will be some that simply will not accept the truth. Its interesting that Ms. Short who you quoted has since changed her mind and agreed that Saddam should be taken out. Now, having lost her voice in your cause, you seek...

ok maybe this isn't as interesting to some other people but have you guys been noticing the thaw going on in North Korea? They start to introduce currency and wages (limited areas), then the link with SK, then the gesture to Japan (apology) clearly aimed at the US then this...

aphex, please understand the situation then. At the end of the Persian Gulf war Kuwait was liberated and the Iraqi forces were beating a hasty retreat north into their country. The coalition was seeing them on satellites and radar and picking them off one by one. But soon it became clear...

The US has a lot of power within the UN but several other countries have the same power (vetoes - France, China, Russia, etc.) So the US is not the UN. Otherwise Bush would not be lobbying right now making deals and trying to win countries over to his side but instead just tell them the way...

aphexcoil, I agree with you 100% !! But remember the US wasn't doing it. They were UN sanctions.

So you don't have a problem with what the US is planning to do (remove Saddam) but you do have a problem with why they may be doing it (their intentions). Am I reading you correctly? I would also love to hear how you propose the removal of Saddam without any bloodshed.

So why are you so against the war that would accomplish that? :confused:

I agree with you. The sooner Saddam is taken out the better. They should have just marched right up to Baghdad in the Persian Gulf war (but that is clear in hindsight - at that time the UN resolution was to free Kuwait, not topple Saddam, so they stopped.) Don't forget that under the same UN...

The embargo was dependant on Saddam's compliance with UN resolutions. His belligerence has caused their continuation. Therefore Saddam is responsible for the awful consequences that his actions entail.

colonization?!? HAHahaha!! Thanks for proving my point. Which Arab country is a colony now? How many years have they been free to do with their people and resources as they please? EVERYTHING I said (and you quoted) is FACT. Please point out which is wrong or incorrect. Please point out...

ok let me clarify the question: Do you believe Saddam to be totally and absolutely not responsible for the death of millions of Iraqis since the Persian Gulf war? yes or no please And again, please provide a quote of me saying those terrible words or apologize for putting words in my...

Let me get this straight. Are you telling me that Saddam Hussein is not responsible in any way whatsoever in the death of innocent Iraqis? Also when did I say they "deserved it". Please provide a quote or apologize for putting such vile words in my mouth.