Search results

Hi Port1385, How many aliases do you really have on this website? Many of us found it awful funny that you wound-up talking to yourself on the very same thread with your other screen-names (PENS WIN and ERICMINDICH), and then you go on to PM me telling me that you had the thread "locked"...

That's not what my friends in NYC have been telling me over the last month or so. :D

If you make it worth my while. Put up $500 and I will post my business card from when I was an employee of Tudor Investments. Put up $1,000 and I will post several trading statements over the course of various years from when I was an independent local on the NYBOT. If you want to see me...

It really is amazing, isn't it? You have a guy with an alias who has only been registered here for two weeks running around attacking me for pointing out how badly this website has slipped in recent years . . . a point that many of us "old timers" appear to agree on. He must not be taking...

Sorry to see Ed go. He was a true entertainer in every sense of the word!

Yeah, I must admit that it is probably a bit too technical of an indicator for most here on ET to digest - - - especially MORONS like yourself. :D But then again, given that 95% of the people here on ET don't TRADE . . . I am not surprised that there are ZERO responses to a post on an...

Bump for an incredible sunset at 8:30PM and 68 degrees on the Bay! http://scienceview.berkeley.edu/view/ :)

While that may be true, remember that her background is deeply versed in fundamentals . . . she was the head research analyst in the Risk Arb department at DLJ. She is anything but a technically-based trader. Too bad Eric Bolling left CNBC. He came onto the NYMEX floor at #4 WTC in the...

June 22nd, 2009: http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=167727 Lucrum, Lucrum . . . did you ever get admitted to a 4-year University, or did your parents admit you into Bellevue at a very young age?

Has the ET neighborhood gone to hell? Yes 52 . . . . . . . . 81.25% No 12 . . . . . . . . 18.75% The numbers don't lie. :p Congratulations Mr. Penguin Piker, you are now on ignore. I have already wasted enough of my time on you. Next time, I suggest you try using the search...

Given how far you've had your nose up George Bush's bum, I know that it would be highly demanding for your miniscule "pea-brain" to fathom the possibility that I have only had one screen-name at a time on ET; during two separate time periods . . . Sept-2002 to June-2004 and July-2006 to present...

Here's proof, from an ET moderator no less. http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2242115&highlight=Landis#post2242115 But thanks for stopping by and showing everyone how ignorant you are, or how ridiculously lazy you are and unable to use the search function.

Given that you are one of the more ignorant clowns on ET, I wouldn't count on you knowing that I've been a member since September of 2002.

Given that you just became a member less than 2 weeks ago, I find it rather surreptitious that you claim to be so "knowledgeable" about where I have made the majority of my posts. But that doesn't surprise me, because it is obvious that you are one of these idiots that runs around ET with...

Hardly. But since you are a new member, you would obviously have no idea how much better the quality of content was just a few years ago . . . as opposed to today. Believe it or not, there were actual REAL traders (scalpers, day-traders, position traders, black-box, etc.) that frequented this...

Poor Dick Cheney. He had "other priorities" during the 60's rather than serving and defending his Country. What a coward.

Leave it to the resident ET CLOWN to ignore all of the other screen-names that he and his "buddies" have on this site.

I stand by my previous post. You are either a LIAR or terribly misinformed.

That's totally meaningless. Because most of us are pretty familiar with how screen-names are "stored" and archived at ET and brought out for "prop-posters" such as yourself to generate web-activity on ET.

You are a liar. Either that, or absurdly ignorant and misinformed. Probably a little bit of both. A Blue Cross Plan of California for a husband and wife in their 40's with a $1,000 deductible is $960 per month...