Search results

Nice call on BTU Mup! It's already printing down in after-hours with 1900 shares at 32.72 and another 1,000 that just went off at 32.40 An equal measured-move down of 3.84 for C=A with today's high being the top of "B" would get you down to 29.51 :)

Of course not. And that is why this kind of information is totally useless for those of us that trade every single day.

I completely disagree. Case in point: TD Ameritrade uses a "filtered" data-feed called streamer that is still not up to robust standards. The Level-2 lags substantially during heavy volume and price activity. As a result, you have to use another data-feed in order to supplement a...

You have admitted that you don't even TRADE the market for a living . . . so why would anyone put any credibility into you and your worthless "cut and paste" posts full of doom and gloom? Face it. You missed out on a tremendous BULL move that has amassed +300 S&P handles since March...

Volume may be the "easiest" indicator, but that does not make it a SIGNIFICANT indicator by any means.

Big deal. What has this got to do with volume? Or are you trying to say that you've been on an equity derivatives trading desk and have a firm understanding of program trading based on agency or principle trading as well as stock-index arbitrage, let alone having the classification of being...

What does it matter to you? You don't even trade.

I disagree. If you are a scalper you cannot afford to use a data-feed that "filters" data by taking a "snapshot". You really need real-time TICK DATA. DTN's IQ-Feed offers that. :)

Dial 411 in Zug, Switzerland. Either that, or he's probably laying low in Spain where there is no extradition treaty. :D

You have got to be one of the dumbest posters to ever post on this website. Traders couldn't care less why prices have rallied as they have. It's meaningless. What's important to a trader is capitalizing off of the move, and MAKING MONEY!!! That means having played the LONG side of...

I call BS on this. Please post a screen-shot of your positions to confirm that you are being honest with people here on ET. Thank You. :)

The above statement is totally absurd. If you are a trader you couldn't care less about VOLUME. If you did, you would have missed a ton of moves this year for HUGE gains. Trading off of volume is a total "rookie" mistake. And given your logic, a trader would have never gotten long in March...

Trading based on volume and volume divergences is a total WASTE OF TIME. Traders get paid in PRICE not VOLUME. It's almost like someone that is going short because the A/D line is not all that impressive, or there is "light" summer or holiday volume. That's a big-time "rookie" mistake...

Ridiculous. There is a TON of asset-allocation going on with managers selling Treasuries and buying equities, or have you not noticed that either?

You sound like a freakin' BROKEN RECORD. You've been making posts like this for the last 300 S&P points! Time to pack your bags dude and leave. You have absolutely ZERO credibility here, and everyone knows it.

A pretty WILD DAY for the TRILOGY, eh? :cool:

You read my MIND Mup!!! Thanks. :)

We just stopped at 979 SPX. Any significance at this price level, Mup?

LOL! :D :D :D Ya gotta love that S2007S. He sure plays a great Fantasy game, eh?

Thank you Sir. I just find it downright pathetic that this is allegedly a TRADING website that applies to the financial markets, and yet some of the BIGGEST posters here ( AAAinthebeltway, S2007S, Gnome aka: Scataphagos, and BuyLowSellHi ) don't even trade 1 share. They spend their entire...