Search results

Most traders that I know would love to catch a 220 point surge in the S&P. I guess for you, you'd rather play the "naysayer" and sit on the sidelines holding your "herman" playing "could have, would have, should have . . ."

With all due respect, you are truly a moron. Moreover, your ability to "rationalize" yourself away from catching rallies in the market is second to none. Do us ALL a favor and stop posting in the Trader's Forum. You obviously are NOT a TRADER.

See the above post by "MKTrader" in order to be truly educated. Until then, you might wish to observe the markets for awhile before making such naive posts. Markets can make bottoms not only based upon price, but also based on time . . .

Excellent point, and one that is completely missed by people that don't have much market "history" under their belts. :)

I vote this to be one of the most ABSURD posts on ET this week . . . My clearing firm pays me based on PRICE, not volume! :D

That is why you are not a TRADER. You say that you "want to buy . . . but can't" so you find a way to RATIONALIZE why you are being left on the sidelines. Do us all a favor and just get lost. Go back to class and stop frequenting these boards when you should be doing your homework. :D

For the last time . . . The FED just put up 25% of its balance sheet as COLLATERAL!!! Figure it out.

He just put up 25% of the FED's balance sheet as collateral. Most poster's here on ET cannot even begin to understand that.

The market is making new highs with the Dow +315 with an hour left in the session . . . Obviously, participants understand the MAGNITUDE of the FED placing 25% of its balance sheet up as collateral. It's called "collateral-cleansing" and most posters on this thread that bash the Fed clearly...

You must not be using REAL TIME quotes . . . the SPX is currently trading 1309.37 :)

Your comment is reflective of someone that seeks to explain moves and DOES NOT TRADE FOR A LIVING.

has been brutal for the shorts . . . Anyone trying to pick a short term TOP today is going through excruciating pain. The bid in the S&P's has been relentless! From 1286 to 1304. Ouch! Anyone been short the last hour or so? I've been short since 1298.00 in several stocks and it...

Yep. Only about 3 watts difference with 800 FSB and DDR-2 RAM.

Congratulations . . . You failed to address my question concerning your claim about "liquidity" drying up in the US Treasury market.

Please explain how all liquidity will be gone ( as you claim ) in a few days from the US treasury market?

And this is precisely why ET has gone down the tubes over the last couple of years . . . But Baron doesn't care about the quality of content on ET. He just cares about "web-hits" that he can market to potential advertisers. Again, the only forums of REAL VALUE on ET are in the software and...

It's because all of the "Detectives" of the world that constantly frequent these forums on ET bitching and moaning about Bernanke being "Helicopter Ben" have ZERO understanding of basic economics, let alone monetary policy. The difference this time around is that the Fed has finally gotten...

Leave it to you to think that the balance sheets of the commercial banking sector are INFLATING. :D You should really try taking a basic course in Economics or Monetary Policy.

Why does this matter to you? You have already admitted last year here that you ARE NOT A TRADER.

You have no idea what you are talking about.