Search results

Same test as route above only using Speakeasy servers with a couple of web-pages open . . . 18,541 down 2,298 up

Comcast "Blast" Service from San Francisco to New York at 4:20PM Pacific Time . . . $52.95 per month. <a href="http://www.speedtest.net"><img src="http://www.speedtest.net/result/267809184.png"></a>

By the way, I have never ever heard about Comcast "throttling" service ( as one poster claimed in a post above ). I have the Comcast "Blast" Service for $52.95 per month and it is fantastic! Make sure you check to make sure that you have the latest version Router possible. Firmware...

Doesn't make a difference. There is absolutely NO difference between the comcast business service, and what they offer to residential customers in as far as speed is concerned.

running 10s outbound test . . . . 2.30 Mb/s client to server running 10s inbound test . . . . . 7.03 Mb/s server to client MaxRwin Received: 65535 MaxRwin Sent: 5840 avgrtt: 76.61 Notes: The theoretical network limit is 137.42 Mbps The NDT server has a 127.0 KByte buffer...

Don't be so lazy. Simply look up the specs at ATI Technologies and you will see that both of the models above support DVI and VGA outputs for dual-monitors. The HD 2400 is a "value" card whereas the HD 2600 is a "mainstream" card. http://ati.amd.com/products/radeonhd2600/specs.html

You could have fooled me. :eek:

Part #2 of this is easy to do, and helpful.... http://howto.helpero.com/howto/Reduce-Firefox-Memory-Usage_4.html

Try going to Tools and then Options. Under Options, open the Advanced panel and click on the Network tab. The default size is 50MB. or Check this out: http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/07/11/how-to-lower-the-amount-of-memory-that-firefox-uses/\

Agreed! It certainly is a "night" and "day" difference. Go McAfee!

I'll leave that to your other multiple personality . . . the one that is orchestrating a boycott of ET! :D http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?threadid=125934

You do realize that 95% of ET has no idea what you just said . . . because all they see is INFLATION! :D

Notice that he is unable to answer your question . . . yet more than HALF of his 48 posts have something to do with me. The guy obviously has some serious "issues". Meanwhile, he posted earlier this week asking for people to boycott ET...

You sound incredibly "bitter". The SPX has rallied 13% since march 17th. Sorry you fought it the entire way. Your post certainly sounds very bitter.

You are a most "troubled" human being. Most delusional indeed.

ET member "Riskarb" tried doing that back in February of 2004, but like the true delusional pussy that he is, James Stock never showed up on the corner of LaSalle and Eugenie at 9AM. Here's the thread that proves it . . ...

Or perhaps you missed this call that I made on August 16th. 2007 with a thread that I started proclaiming that a target for a bottom was reached at 1375 SPX and that it was time to no longer play the short-side...

I guess you missed me calling the SPX TOP last Summer back on July 9th, 2007 about one week before hand and just 3.19 point away from the actual high print (1555.90), before a very sharp 12% decline in just 4 weeks occurred with this thread that I started entitled: "Wave Five Target =...

That's pretty "rich" considering how you have claimed to have been SHORTING this rally all the way up with various inverse ETF's and getting your head handed to you the entire way as you consistently told people that the market was simply in a "sideways" range even though the SPX has risen over...

He was made to look like a "fool" by several people down in a thread that I had started last month in the "Feedback Forum" . . . and now it appears as though he is "stalking" me on ET . . . just like he did years ago with all of his other "aliases." Nothing new here.