Search results

Actually, that wasn't hard to admit at all. The facts are the facts. Period. We essentially decided to invade Iraq based on several mobile trailers, some aluminum tubes that our very own Energy Department laughed at, and the Niger uranium forgeries that the Bush Administration used in an...

She's been like that for years . . . No big surprise.

Carter Worth, an accurate bullish technician that called the rally is now getting off the SHIP!!! :)

Charles Nenner is on CNBC right now (3:30pm) looking to get short and new lows. Patting himself on the back for appearing in front of Mark Haines back in February and targeting a rally to 1000. The problem is, he never got his subscribers long! :D He was on the "sidelines" the entire time...

Great opportunities for scalping here this afternoon - - - while leaning on the S&P as a bogey. At the END OF THE DAY, it's ALL ABOUT MAKING $$$. Screw the definitions. It's a waste of time. :D

Your lack of reading comprehension is absolutely staggering. Contrary to you, I actually TRADE FOR A LIVING and don't have the time for this. I believe that I explained (more than adequately) the FACT that civil union rights are NOT portable and that legal guardian rights when a member of...

:D

Just another head-fake dip. You should do yourself a favor and turn off the CNBC. Bulls buy into the dip and NEW HIGHS come! :)

The market just EXPLODED to new highs.

Example: If a same sex union couple with a child leaves California for Nebraska, they will not be recognized as the legal parent of that child. As a result, the child would not be entitled to government benefits if one of the members of the couple become disabled or die. The child would...

Glenn Neely now has done an "about face" due to Monday's sell-off and believes that there is a 1-2 week decline coming. Sold out of his longs yesterday for a 9 point profit ( 833 to 842 ). Believes that Monday's decline shows that a "c" wave has been completed and now he looks for a "d"...

Really now? So how would you 'counter' the FACT that a same-sex civil union loses their rights as soon as they move out of the State of California because such rights are not "portable"? I'm listening. And please be specific with your reply.

Your grandiose sense of self-importance is downright staggering. No one really gives a crap what you or I think on an anonymous website on the Internet superhighway that is one notch above that of a Yahoo finance message board. But for some reason, your sense of self-importance speaks...

Nope, the actual word imminent was never used, but I think that all of the "fear-mongering and saber-rattling by the Bush Administration was clear that there was a "sense of urgency" being painted. Do you not forget Condi Rice talking about a Mushroom Cloud in her September 8th, 2002...

If that's true, then why are you here still posting?

He could, but my guess is that he craves the attention he gets here. That is why he is unable to "let go" of ET. That is why there is now a suggestion of a "poll". :D

Just took the steam out of the broad market as the news hit. Comes from the CFO during an industry conference. I smell a debt for equity offering soon! :)

His response is quite telling I'd say. Looks like I struck a sensitive nerve. Sometimes, the TRUTH does that to you. And so much for a man's word meaning something and "making his last post" on ET. I knew he couldn't stay away from this place. :)

Are you not able to understand the FACT that same-sex "civil-unions" requires tremendous legal contract expenses to even get close to the same rights conferred upon heterosexual marriage contracts? Try reading the link that I provided in a previous post, and that FACT should have an impact on...

Obviously someone that has never day-traded during big surges in volume.