Search results

I would pay a hefty sum to see Rush Limbaugh or Karl Rove's fat ass under fire in Fallujah, and I am sure many U.S. Soldiers and Marines would ante up some smokes or MREs to see the same.

I had this problem a while back with Firefox. It has something to do with your Exception Cookie settings, I think. I had to reinstall FF to get it to work again. That's the easiest solution. Just don't do a clean reinstall b/c it will wipe out your bookmarks, etc.

Anyone else have any issues trying to download Chrome with Firefox?

I appreciate the honesty.

Make sure to watch the video. It's amazing.

These commentators (all on Fox) speak directly to issues about Palin's experience or qualifications, or what's fair game in bringing up about her. You can't meet the challenge?

If ANY Republican is up to the challenge, reconcile the statements of Rove, Dick Morris, or Bill O'Reilly, so that they can be defended as anything other THAN RAVING HYPOCRITES AND POLITICAL TOOLS as stated by their own words in this video: <embed FlashVars='videoId=184086'...

I dare anyone to explain the inconsistent statements of Rove, O'Reilly or Morris in a way that allows them to be reconciled. You obviously have to watch the (short) clips first. I await your analysis anxiously. Jon Stewart is the last and best source of real news and actual truth in...

You can thank the Republicans for that. They have all but immunized physicians and hospitals from liability (it used to be out of control in favor of plaintiffs, but the pendulum has now swung to the extreme opposite direction - even when they butcher someone, there are no consequences)...

Zurich or bust.

http://gawker.com/5045218/palin-had-affair-says-enquirer Ron Paul '08!!! Hell, I'd vote for McCain if he put Ron Paul a heartbeat away from the presidency!

I know you're a huge McCain fan, but why so serious? If the stories not true, then no worries, right? http://gawker.com/5045218/palin-had-affair-says-enquirer

Here's the cover and a promise by the Enquirer of 'more to come': http://meaningfuldistractions.wordpress.com/2008/09/03/news_national_enquirer_promises_more_on_alleged_sarah_palin_affair_78787/ BUCKLE UP: NATIONAL ENQUIRER PROMISES MORE ON THE ALLEGED SARAH PALIN AFFAIR...

Hehe. Fair point.

I know they're a tabloid, but they usually don't shy away from publishing something like this unless they have proof. That McCain's team has threatened litigation signals smoke. And where there's smoke.... Well, you know.

The Enquirer had the goods on Edwards, and they may have the goods on Palin, too. If so, she's burnt toast along with McCain.

Wow. If it IS true (guess we'll have to wait), it will destroy McCain's campaign. I wonder if this was the October Surprise delivered early?

Will the National Enquirer make it two for two? http://www.theage.com.au/world/palin-denies-affair-rumours-20080904-49cv.html Palin denies affair rumours * Anne Davies * September 4, 2008 - 1:04PM The McCain campaign has vigorously denied reports that Republican...

She gave a good, prepared speech, and delivered it well. That doesn't mean she's intelligent. Not only that, but it may all be moot IF the breaking news about her and a certain affair IS true (we'll have to wait and see; if it is, then McCain's vetting team is the 'dumb bitch').

Link? If that's true, it will be the end of McCain-Palin without question.