Search results

the evidence is in the videos. you see people setting up the protestors like a cameraman directs a swimsuit model. you see the "protestors" dutifully placing the flowers in front of the camera in the second video you see the ccn "reporter" comment on the placement of the flowers. That is...

you may have said that but you also denied that fox news said it had a federal law enforcement source.

oh know slanted polls this early? 538's founder explains that polls don't really county until they herd in front of the election. we called it unskewing.

did fox news claim to have a federal law enforcement source? yes... then I was correct. no... then you were correct. --- here is a quote of the article... proving I told the truth and you were wrong. An FBI forensic report of Rich's computer -- generated within 96 hours after Rich's murder...

house gerrymandering was done by democrats too. it is designed to make sure they have more "minority" seats than they might otherwise have. when you see that trump dominated the county vote... you realize democrats are all bunched up... without gerrymandering... there is a strong argument they...

here is my proof it was staged. watch the video watch them get set up. watch them drop the flowers just before the camera rolls. watch the second video I provided and see that that CNN reporter sickly talk about the how the flowers were on the street. where is your proof that it was not staged.

I was you moron... this was what I said... "the consensus was based on 95 of 97 scientists out of a survey of 10,000. it was a joke." you tried to correct me by bring up some consensus of a consensus.

hey moron... the origin of the 97% consensus was the survey of 10,000... not the paper you cited. your paper was about a consensus of a consensus written by a very biased cartoonist and at least one agw nutter scientist/propagandist. citing the EPA means squat. Trump is restructuring it.

you keep assuming facts not in evidence. It is possible that is true. Maybe they had been protesting in an organic and un paid for right near where they staged that protest. But, you have produced no photographic or visual evidence of the defense you have chosen. I would like to see it so...

its unbelievable you would deny what is happening on that video.

the demonstration shown on air by CNN was staged. The proof of that claim is the first video on this thread. the excuse from cnn is that is just recreated from the cordoned off area. its pretty simple show the video of the organic demonstration.

video evidence of the shot being staged is not grasping at straws. CNN looks ridiculous and is rightly being ridiculed. Now if they were to find video footage of the organic demonstrating being on the other side of the cordoned off area... perhaps the staging of this shot would be excusable.

what? your excuse it you did not click on the link? you were destroyed by your own source. You excused the staging as a photo op. "The term has acquired a negative connotation, referring to a carefully planned pseudo-event, often masqueraded as news" according to use cnn uses carefully...

I noticed you cut off your wikipedia definition and then sort of edited in your own point about opportunity. Here is something you should have included... "The term has acquired a negative connotation, referring to a carefully planned pseudo-event, often masqueraded as news" (emphasis added)...

filming and reporting on a spontaneous demonstration is not a photo op. why are you arguing such a stupid point. cnn defended itself by saying they were letting the people through the cordoned off area. so let them show us the video of that organic demonstration.

that was good. my laugh got stronger the more I thought about what those congressional hearings have accomplished. well played.

I am against racism for various reasons... but I want to see a fair debate. I think we should recognize that the change in voting patterns is not just about racism. Most of my relatives in New York and New England switched from voting democrat to republican because democrats abandoned their...

look at that troll tactic. you are trying to change the subject... and you lie about it. I stated Fox news said they had a federal law enforcement source. I proved they did make that statement. We were not commenting on whether it was true... but whether they made that statement.

you are being very disingenuous with the definition of photo op. Photo ops are staged events - like a on a campaign trail. everyone should understand the event is an arranged and agreed upon photo op including the viewer. a photo up should not be confused with news coverage of supposedly...

shots like that are routinely staged? that is exactly the point.