Search results

These memes just did 20 to 30 years worth of work against the establishment media in a just a few months. High school kids are passing around these memes in the chat circles for fun. The kids making the lefty arguments in the future won't be able to just point to cnn or establishment media...

you seem to mistaking imply or actually believe co2 can only warm. you seem to be the only person who does not understand the properties of a greenhouse gas. Tell us the truth do you realize co2 can also act so as to cause cooling? We live in a complex system with negative feedbacks... its...

what do you mean when you say its the spread? I am not sure you know what you were looking at. everyone would realize I meant the grey zone on the chart when I said box.

what happens after Trump leaves office was irrelevant to this exercise - you leftist imbecile. The article by a law professor set the bounds of our inquiry. Your point about what happens after trump leaves office is incredibly irrelevant. its like you were so triggered you wrote the first...

I don't know what that was. If that was a gesture of obsequiousness it was wrong. I think McEnroe had it right when he said the royals should be bowing to the people who are doing things.

except for the caveats which you could run an oil tanker through. did you catch the caveats... 1. The Justice Department, as well as many scholars, haveopinedthat a sitting president cannot be indicted and tried for a crime. So the ultimate issue, whatever Mueller's findings, will come down to...

the reason why successful traders seem to be alt right is that in order to trade for a living and make many trades... you have to very good and see reality. You can't kid yourself. You can't listen to CEOs you can't let yourself get tricked by govt officials. you can't listen to wall street's...

only trolls would try and make that argument or give it a like. i presented a chart with 102 climate models on it. that was not my chart it was a climate scientists.

do you really want to waste your time on this. We covered these polls real time. it was not just abc but many others which used democrat rich samples and had hillary up by 6 to 14 points. Then when the polls unskewed (herded) they had the race much closer. Sometimes in the margin for error...

having been a trader I am well aware we all have filters and biases. but when we are using imperfect measurements that are being adjusted and the temperatures near cities are going up but not the ones in the country. And we are grafting instrumental measurments onto tree ring, ice core and...

you can go to judith currys site and see a discussion of this chart. there is some question about the grey lines... it looks like your author overstated the degree of uncertainty.... however, you realize that outside the grey lines even agw nutter scientists agree the models have failed. So...

oceans have been rising since the last ice age. change in ocean temps leads change in co2 levels. when you see a chart like this... do you still think that man is causing the oceans to rise?

he is receiving a medal. what else was he going to do to be civil. see the video for yourself. it took about 30 seconds to search and find. but I will say I probably would have set it up another way because if I were president I would not be bowing to anyone but God himself. I certainly...

you don't even comprehend what you are looking at. that grey box... the bottom of is the 2.5% line. When the models fall below that line even agw nutter scientists admit the models are failing. you can see the modes are failing. whatever temperature data sets you use which are supposed to...

no one faked the charts... here is another look for trolls with facts issues. the models projected far more warming than there has been. only liars are denying this fact.

and I showed you, you could go back and see the models failed even more. your chart is ridiculous... we are talking about models projections into the future when tested on real time data... not modeling past scenarios... you are not seriously going troll like that are you.

this is the 102 failed models... chart. this has nothing to do with hansens 1988 scare testimony in which his scenario A said by 2025 to 50 we would see 3 to 9 degrees of warming. (unless his model is off the chart.)

you are now distracting your ass off... you brought up the hansen testimony crap not me. that has nothing to do with the failed models I cited. Total BS. They projected THREE scenarios - and your guy ignores the BEST case scenario and averages it out with the WORST case scenario to peddle...

on its face that chart is ridiculous. we are talking about the models projections going forward from about the time they were made... til now and the near future.... not the past. in fact you point out the problem most traders know about. fitting your models to past data almost always...

no one had to delete data to prove the models are failing. anyone who looks at the projections can see they projected big temperature rises... and there has been very little to no rise the last 20 years depending on the data set you look at. its a known by everyone but trolls. here is the...