Search results

The only way I see it working is only those who pay the LVT are allowed to vote and then only in proportion to their tax obligation should their vote be weighted. Also I see huge problems in fair valuation/manipulation of supposed land value assessments. 40% tax on land :D :D :D yeah...

You have got to be fricken kidding me GREECE is worried about it's international reputation. :D :D :D :D That's like bernie madoff being embarrassed about having an overdue library book ruining his reputation for fiscal prudence.

tweeting is for twits anyway. btw:It's never a good idea to let the world know both who you are and what you think. yes facebook idiots I'm referring to you.

1)virtual lvt is just a BULL SHIT "lets pull a new tax out of our asses because the politicians are crying for more money". In a few years we will be right back to where we are now but with stupidly high land taxes. 2)The fact that land is fixed is a HUGE problem not a solution. 3)Think...

Sounds like a much better plan IMHO.

Honestly I don't think very highly of the plan esp in light of our current information economy. 1)How do you justify a rural farmer being hit with high taxes and a company say like amazon running on a very small platform space of servers paying virtually no tax at all. 2)Next is, the...

Quick how can we blame Bush?

never heard of it before. Wouldn't the US govt be the biggest taxpayer under that plan?

Honestly it sounds like too much work for me, I'm not really interested. I come here to post my opinions and occasional fact to back it up , otherwise I'd have to be paid for my efforts if you want a bunch of research. Sorry but that's the situation.

humor us, maybe you will be cogent the 4th time around without getting banned.

Why can't you just spit it out? You won't debate because you're a "committed ideologue".

Why don't you detail what Keynesian economics suggests in your own words? Then you can have a discussion without the dreaded "cut n paste" plus the accusations of straw-men arguments.

Yeah but if we wait until the data is conclusive we'll all be dead from AGW! so we gotta panic now & destroy civilization in order to "maybe" save it .

Actually I did add the all important last line . No Keynesian advocate would forget the "free gov't money", part of the scheme.

It must suck to have the whole applied Keynesian school of thought be described in one cartoon. Too much "cut n paste"for ya?

You do know the sole reason Keynesian economics has any standing whatsoever is it's popularity with "kick the can down the road , get me elected now politicians" don't you. I mean c'mon it's the equivalent of adults legitimizing /worshiping the "tooth fairy".

I wonder who pee drinker stole that quote from?

It's not that at all, it's just you idiots pack so much untruth and silliness into one sentence that dissecting the errors of a paragraph would take a whole book to correct.

That's really scary until I remember my boat floats on TOP of the water.:D :D

Sounds kinda stupid once you realize that infrastructure was built BECAUSE of past business success.