Search results

Quite frankly you seem to gloss over it's the condition of "hubris" first that causes the latter, not the other way around. In essence you are conflating the problem and mistakenly assigning it as a "logical error".

Horse apples, plenty of people with critical thinking skills can *rationalize anything away and make retarded decisions if not emotionally grounded. *They are blithely unaware of their"some sort of fallacy in their numerical analysis or in their critical thinking" until it's too late.

I think he should have used an empty podium with an obvious teleprompter (next to it) instead. Everybody, even the democrats watching, would have understood the message.

obviously the storm shelter or some closet/pantry. If you have an apartment that would be your master bathroom.

The RNC better get their heads outta their collective asses. The party of socialism-light has no future. If they effectively shut down the grass roots conservatives from input, the republican party will seal their fate to destruction. Conservatives merely find it more convenient to try...

Thankfully the easy gubbermint career track is coming to an end. I can't wait til the current crop of teat suckers figures this out. Some people are going to be in for a serious reality adjustment and I'll be laughing my ass off at them. When the bill for gubbermint excess comes due it...

Somehow doubt our ghoul is gonna chime in on this one, unless this is one of those so called 50% tax benefits he was bragging about earlier. Imagine how stupid you would feel if you had to pay 50% of your income to stupid fvckers like this, and THIS is the service of...

IMHO, I think the history of trading and financial markets casts serious doubts on your assertions.

smell and all that girlyman thrashing about in the water. Evidently I was decidedly uninformed about shark visual acuity. I thought they had poor eyesight. But check out this link. http://www.sharksavers.org/en/education/biology/myth-sharks-have-poor-vision1/

That's the stupidest idea I've seen outside the P&R forum. Maybe even including P&R.

Sure they can, they lose out to the firm that somehow can do it faster. I can't think of a worse business model, unless your firm is top dog.

Seriously 34% of whites over the age of 25 have 4 yr degrees. No wonder it doesn't mean jack now.

There's no flattering choice: They cannot accept that a genetic cause is at work and and recognizing crappy cultural/environmental causes isn't esteem boosting either : Therefore the tests must be wrong and if the test are not wrong it must be inherent racism in the ether that's the problem...

I disagree, all that gobbly gook about critical thinking has it's place but it's trumped by avoiding behavioral finance traps and mastering one's emotions.

If your rules are to get flat at an arbitrary time say EOD (like in daytrading ),yeah it makes a huge difference.

Not really day trading fails primarily due to higher overhead costs than other time frames. It really isn't all that hard to see. It's kinda funny when you think about the HFT firms battling it out for 1 tick.

Tell you what I'll sing "kumbaya" while you change the subject , AGAIN. That make you happy?

I'm pretty sure my ancestors killed off yours with aplomb , so piss off (if you think you have a right to vote here). :)

I thought we were talking about VOTING, numbnuts. What's with the "bait n switch" tactic?

Now let's see where those SUCCESSFUL Affirmative Action beneficiary students finally flocked to? Business where good old fashioned hard work and competence pay off most , RIGHT? You wouldn't expect those that gamed the system to get there, would be still milking that system now would you...