Search results

You're right we don't need 'em, nor do we need min wage laws and we damn sure don't need Robert E. Lee's birthday off as a federal holiday.

Compared to myself.

On a consistent basis ,I sure do.

Right , gotcha: cause futures trading is sooo much easier than trading stocks. :D :D 1) How would you know?

Isn't that state of legal ambiguity nice for the homeowner. Ya gotta be a fricken barrister to understand the crap shoot that defending yourself and your home entails. All for the low low price of 50% of everything you earn. wow now that's govt service, I tell you yessireee that's where...

To whom are you directing the question?

Funny how ghoul stoops ,just to deliver personal attacks against me but fails to address the issue and slithers off from whence he came. I wonder if this post will stimulate him to man up a bit, and chime in. I'm sure whatever he says is awfully important to understanding the facts...

(In the tradition of Horton hears a who.) Hark, I hear a queef!

No successful business blithely ignores costs, that only happens with fools pontificating on the internet or daydreaming in mom's basement.

Well good luck , I think you're gonna need it. I read a study put out by finance professors , I believe it was the brokerage info from taiwanese market . conclusion only 1% of day traders are consistently profitable and the more frequently you trade in general the worse your results.

1) I don't think anybody is consistently getting 100% returns year in and year out in the first place. If they are they are 1 in 100 million people. 2) the variability of returns /vs certainty of expenses makes #1 decidedly less attractive

You're not really serious are you?

I'm sorry but as a medical professional, your scenario doesn't make much sense . Either explain it or I'm gonna throw a trump card down and call BULL SHIT.

I don't know why you seem to think (erroneously I might add ) that this is some sort of personal sore spot for me, and gives you the green light to make personal attacks as a red herring tactic. It isn't, so move on.

When I know I'm right with absolute certainty I don't feel the need to belabor the issue. PS: No hard feelings I still consider you quite an astute and informed trader.

What the hell are you talking about? Seriously I'd be interested in reading a medical explanation of the example you are using as an excuse for a late term abortion.

No not really all the wars we've fought in had to with making it safe for our govt not our people. You might be right that they the govt implied or actually claimed what you said but "they lie".

I think you summed up your hallucination quite nicely.

That assumption is a pretty big IF,... Tell you what I'll let you go on with your hallucinations on the subject, it's a subtle point that you probably have internalized anyway.

1) Well excuse me for putting you in checkmate without explaining all the steps to you. 2) You have reading comprehension problems. I already stated critical thinking skills have their place.