Search results

>It obviously depends which researcher you choose. Prerhaps it does, but we don't know that yet because you WON'T POST ANY CURRENT/PAST numbers. >I have posted both sides of the issue. You haven't even posted ONE side of the issue. You continue to post on ANOTHER issue -- one that i...

Why would you need to assert current growth ONLY by producing future projections? Why don't you just come up with CURRENT numbers to support CURRENT growth. This seems like a very logical and reasonable thing to do. This is a very unusual situation. Normally, researchers attempt to learn...

>Time will tell who's right... No, time WON'T tell who's right since the growth of christians in the future is not what is in debate. Why must you always insist on attempting to debate things not in debate. I'll tell you what. I'm gonna stipulate again. I'll stipulate that the FUTURE...

Shoe: >I think it's nothing but sour grapes on the part of your >more liberal researcher. He sees virtually flat growth >among the atheists and tries to twist the numbers for >the religious communites as well! Who is my researcher Shoe? JB...

NO, globally you ONLY produce FUTURE PROJECTIONS to support a PRESENT growth claim. And then somehow you thing that present anecdotal evidence is relevent. No one is ignoring your numbers showing PRESENT TENSE explosive christian growth. YOU AREN'T PRODUCING ANY. JB

Shoe: >I think it's nothing but sour grapes on the part of your >more liberal researcher. He sees virtually flat growth >among the atheists and tries to twist the numbers for >the religious communites as well! Who is my researcher Shoe? JB

And again you go straight to FUTURE projections to support a claim of PRESENT growth. Never mind Shoe. Really. Never mind. JB

You are sooo beyond clueless it is amazing. This is a nice little story Shoe. Shall I wow you with the story of my big TASR trade yesterday, or would you really prefer to know how I did yesterday OVERALL? JB

Shoe: >So please choose an example that >actually illustrates your point. It illustrates my point perfectly. The point has nothing to do with the validity of the researchers or the validty of my ablility to manage a fund. The point only had to do with my opening statement where I said...

Who is my researcher Shoe?

Those are very nice numbers Shoe. Wanna see the stellar explosive growth numbers for the hedge fund I am opening this morning. Todays fund value. $1,000,000 2025 fund value. 1,000,000,000 Stellar returns don't you think? Get the connection? You didn't say "The explosive growth...

Shoe: >I think it's nothing but sour grapes on the part of your >more liberal researcher. He sees virtually flat growth >among the atheists and tries to twist the numbers for >the religious communites as well! Who is my researcher Shoe? JB

I'm sorry I don't have more time. We will get back to this but I have to catch a plane to Baltimore. As a simple demonstration of how spastic your debating style is, I will leave you with two of your own quotes from the last few hours. These quote diametrically oppose each other. First...

>I was justified in saying that Christianity >is experiencing explosive growth. Ok, so my hypothetical trading account which is returning static or perhaps even declining numbers is experiencing "exploding growth" because I made a couple of really great trades yesterday that made a ton of...

Stu: :My question is WHY? Why would anyone want :to keep hurling blind assertion around as a :form of argument?? Hey, we should be giving kudos here. Shoe is digging into the numbers and actively working on conclusions. Positive reenforcement. Now, #1 I'm pretty solid on because I...

You haven't even TRIED to address Shoe Myth #1 yet. You seem to be focused on #2 and that's cool. Let's make that one EASY on you... >"Conservatively there are now 400 million Christian >charismatics worldwide. And where in 1906 less that >1 % of the world Christian communion was...

Shoe Myth #2: Evangelicals agree on core doctrine so therefore this talk of christian/biblical core conflict is really overblown. Shoe: >Again, I think you see remarkable consistency around >evangelicals, which represent 1000's and 1000's of >different churches and denominations...

Ok, promised some Shoe sparks. Here we go Shoe: >The explosive growth in Christianity is coming >almost entirely from the evangelic (and of course >charismatic) communities. "explosive growth in christianity"? You live in a dream world my friend, where everyone agrees with you...

Jem: >Records being one of the frequent >exceptions to the hearsay objection. OMG! Axe, if you don't nail him on the irrelevance of the above statement I WILL! >Leave the law to lawyers. I will leave it to the GOOD ones, but not ones that misrepresent rules such as the above. JB

Shoe: >The remarkable thing is that there is a core that is >agreed upon by the vast majority of those who believe >that the Bible literally from God. Just cause you keep saying it doesn't make it true. You are getting ready to go down in flames. No time right now or you would be a...