Search results

So Ockam's Razor, that's what. When two separate theories can completely explain some set of observations of interest, the simpler theory is always the correct one. In science the only reason to reject a simple theory for a more complicated one is because the simple theory can no longer...

McCain did more than pay lip service. A lot of mainstream Republicans were turned off by McCain's choice of Palin, including some in this forum who said so at the time. The fact that all you saw was a MILF has blinded you to that. As far as Rush goes, he's far less a conservative than he is...

Sounds like the voice of experience. You reichtards sure love to put your sexual perversions on display in this forum. :D

In this forum, it's 99% from the Right, and almost none of you are New Yorkers. So it's just right-wing gasbags looking at any opportunity to attack a Democrat (as if Democrats would give a fuck about any qualified Republican appointed to the Senate by a Republican governor).

Funny how you guys never protest whenever Gord from Alberta weighs in. Oh yeah, he's on your side. :p Regarding CK, it's great just to see her potential appointment get all these right-wing panties in a twist. Better entertainment than Comedy Central! :D

You aren't listening. I didn't say McCain was a right-winger and your first choice in the primaries, I said he RAN as a right-winger because the base demanded it. Regardless of feelings, the right voted for McCain. This is hilarious. Rush supported Bush in 2000 and 2004, and he supported...

Only for those (like you) who ignore the extremely obvious fact that McCain didn't run as a moderate, he ran as a rightwinger because that was the only way to energize the evangelical red-meat base. He bragged during the primaries about agreeing with Bush over 90% of the time. He could have...

That's hilarious. You nutjobs are still attacking Clinton EIGHT years later but we're supposed to forget all about Bush before he's even out of office. Like Thunderdog said: unbelievable. Just face facts: all Presidents have screwed up at one time or another. So don't be mad if somebody...

Ah, that ol' fantasy: Bush has kept us safe since 9/11. That's crap. Not only did 9/11 happen on Bush's watch, so did the anthrax attacks ... AFTER 9/11. So did Muhammad and Malvo ... AFTER 9/11. So did other incidents. Bush couldn't even do the normal, expected thing of providing decent...

That guy practiced his throw, I'd bet on it. He knew he'd have one last shot at Bush and he took it. I think he planned on being shot ("martyred") by the Secret Service. Good thing Bush stayed in shape, all that exercise paid off.

as best representing our unprovoked war in Iraq?

'Twas a joke, dope. Obviously Bush can count, but he misspeaks so habitually, it's very hard to resist making fun of. "Tarriers and bariffs ..." :D

"So he threw a shoe. So what?" No, Mr. Bush, he threw two shoes. 1 + 1 = 2 Good thing your reflexes are better than your math skills. :D

Given how they have US citizens all taking off our shoes at airports after that "shoe bomber" fuckup, you'd think they would be on the lookout for something like that. :p Secret Service asleep at the switch. No way he should have been able to throw that second shoe. Prediction: barefoot...

Ergodic is easy to code. According to William Blau: Ergodic Oscillator (EO) = TSI - EMA(TSI,5) The short-term parameter in TSI is also usually set to 5. So the only variable is the long-term parameter in TSI.

It's his homework assignment. :D

That's odd, the word "God" doesn't appear anywhere in my copy of the US Constitution. Where does it appear in yours?

Bill Gates was the luckiest SOB on the planet. Imagine having a small pc software company at the exact same time IBM wants to invade the pc world but do it on the cheap, so they go looking for some crappy operating system to put on their new personal computers, you'd just happened to buy one...

What you say is true: the fact of evolution does not preclude the existence of a Creator (although it certainly eliminates the deity depicted in the Book of Genesis, which is what almost all of the fuss is about). However I am reminded of a story: when Pierre-Simon LaPlace had improved on...

I didn't come with the names, that's the accepted lingo: Newton's theory of gravity, Darwin's theory of evolution. If it was up to me, I'd have named them Newton's theory about gravity and Darwin's theory about evolution, to clear up any misinterpretations. A "theory of x" does sound like...