Search results

I truthfully can tell you that I didn't catch on to that. Who is being a dhick now.

Just because he asked you nicely to make it easier to read your context!?

Was flipping through channels and came across long infomercial about Online Trading Academy. Looks like they're targeting retirees. One woman was saying she was paying her medical bills thanks to them. They use word INCOME multiple times. WTF!?

Welcome! I don't think this makes sense. The only guidance you can get on the performance/psychology side. The rest is too individualized. There's no "right path" to guide you towards, imho.

Are there any statistics which show that PFOF results in worse execution quality than internalization? I have not seen any. My view is that if the broker doesn't invest in it's infrastructure (retail brokers have no incentive to), then I would rather HFTs do the internalization and routing ...

I was under impression that Tyson's style was his natural way of boxing. Apparently, it takes years of dedicated practice ...

I am not a customer, but if you don't need speed and/or DMA, why pay commissions? As long as the broker sells order flow (or intrenalizes), they need to prove that their execution quality worth the commissions they charge. They can't and won't.

I agree with all you said, but I think what he meant (and what I agree with) is that no matter who/what the participants are, we are just trading the collective markets the best we can. When I have a bad trade, I don't blame the algos or institutions, or anyone but myself. Doesn't stop me from...

Which one?

Short via Futures?

Algos were just kind to you my friend :)

Yeah, when HFTs can make a profit on buying and selling at the SAME price, inefficiencies are harder to find and even harder to capture.

Profitable ones are certainly created by people who understand how markets work, imo. I think the key word is "efficient." I was listening to a podcast with Linda Raschke and she was describing a strategy which slowly (years) went from $85 gain per trade to $5 ... Still working but not worth...

Why would averages be irrelevant? I don't think I have ever read a book or TA article which did not have one.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/04/10/ned-davis-research-founder-says-algos-have-ruined-day-trading.html

https://m.benzinga.com/article/13509968?utm_referrer=android-app%3A%2F%2Fcom.google.android.googlequicksearchbox%2Fhttps%2Fwww.google.com&utm_source=android-app%3A%2F%2Fcom.google.android.googlequicksearchbox%2Fhttps%2Fwww.google.com

My two cents on this ... The last drop(2008) was severe and we had been conditioned to buy the dip. I am thinking that we haven't had a prolonged (2-3years) bear market in a while and no one is expecting it. So either that or more likely just a couple of years of going nowhere. Moving from...

Would be useful for you to give a threshold below which you would consider to be a good deal.

https://tabbforum.com/opinions/speedbumps-redux-sort-of/?utm_source=TabbFORUM+Alerts&utm_campaign=602f581641-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_04_05_06_50&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_29f4b8f8f1-602f581641-279523381