Search results

Do you think briefing reading entitles him to the office? There is a one in a hundred chance the Senate can muster 2/3 majority to ask Trump to leave. Based on that, sure, go ahead and read the bosses mail. Were you thinking there were six ways to Sunday the intelligence heads could help...

I disagree. Beijing Biden is currently trespassing with his fake "office of the president elect". He wont be entitled to anything till the election is properly, and fully adjudicated. Who? The Secret Service? The Army? The Air Force? National Guard?

Oh, you mean those crimes he didn't really commit...while the malicious prosecutors actually committed crimes?

Actually, i think its the other way round, and it is up to a real President to stand his ground.

Two-thirds of Senate IS a kind of force, the only force he should heed. If they cant get that together, what other "force" could you be talking about?

Lots of opinions floating around. So, Trump should neither concede nor leave until what happened in the states is an established, well audited fact. Til then, its your opinion that all the current mountain of testimony is false.

No it only means he was under duress by real criminals. I know enough law to say with surety, any contract under duress is null and void. By the way, what crimes are you claiming he committed?

Not sure what you mean. The states are where the fraud happened. Thats ok for their own mayors. Not ok for federal elections as it affects all other peoples in the honest states.

Saying Beijing Biden won most votes in history, more than Obama, while hiding in his basement, stumbling over words, anointed by the DNC (not the real winner of the primaries) , and unable to draw a crowd... does not make it a fact. What is a fact is election fraud taken to a higher level this...

Oh yah, i forgot about that. All the more reason Trump should stay. He should only leave if 2/3 the Senate thinks he should go.

Nope. Only a crime makes anyone a criminal. Its not a crime to plead guilty under duress.

Possibly state legislators send electors that perpetuate the fraud. In which case i would expect Trump to stay. Perhaps he should leave if one elector from each state shows up in the federal House with negative results. But even then, he should never concede without an election re-do that...

Explicitly says not pardoning for a crime. Says pardon is not needed for the innocent. Pleading guilty, in modern US prosecutorial culture, does not guarantee actual guilt. More often it is a reflection of whats called malicious prosecution. Sadly this happens alot because there are not strong...

Disagree, it will likely be the Constitution that keeps him in. Yes, it has timetables, but those are not more important than peaceful succession of power.

Trump will probably trump a mere court win with a legislative branch win, that being a Constitutional win.

Good luck with that Mr. former vice President! Im quite sure there is a law that obligates Trump to stay.

2. Not if 6 millions of those votes have been stolen, yes, 6 million. 1. If Repubs have the House and Senate in 2022, it is enough.

In my opinion, Trump should also not leave until everyone is satisfied by an election. That is, even if another election is required to bring the necessary transparency, it is Trump's duty to stay. If ever there was a "national security" concern that was ever actually legitimate, this is it...

Trump should never concede. Even if all the administration's current legal challenges run out of time due to politics, he should not concede. The more they pressure to concede, the more it appears they are desperate to grab the power. So long as there is the slightest doubt, he should not...

How do extrapolate that from the letter? Oh, and until the betting parlors pay out one way or another, its not over. If you think its over, go put your money where your mouth is and post screenshots back here.