Search results

I don't see a lot of difference between exGOP and the Vegas shooter in terms of politics. exGOPer just hasn't picked up a gun yet, hoping to incite others to pick up a gun so he can stay safe in his hole.

The shooter was a white man with a brown girlfriend coming from a retirement community 80 miles from Vegas. So he probably watches CNN et al, and bought whatever the mainstream media said about Charlottesville. Charlottesville is where the media attempted to tie together a southern...

When i found out the target of the Las Vegas attack was a concert of mostly red-white-and-blue country music fans, i understood the probable motive enough to make a prediction about the shooters politics. Any guesses?

It's my understanding that cultural marxists see things as they would like them to be and use any wedge to get there.

Root causes? I was reading some Philippines history a while back. There was a report dating back maybe three hundred years, an Islamic knife-man striking a public market, taking out as many people as he could until subdued. No, this is before any such thing as USA. It's rooted in the...

Wrong again. You'll talk about anything except the elephant in the room, rather than admit you are wrong about the anthem and the flag.

I'm more aware of that than you are. The King of England still thought of this side of the ocean as colonies, as late as 1812, when he proposed, again, to colonize them. It was his intention to reimpose a brutal police state over the "states". Sound familiar?

If you insist the flag represent all battles the U.S. has initiated, or defended against, the flag soon becomes vague, suspicious, and meaningless. But if you focus on just one battle all can agree on, maybe they could invoke a temporary sense of unity. That's probably what they are trying to...

Not true. I'm well aware the Marines were first chartered to dispense with the problem of Islamic culture around the mediteranian, especially out of North Africa, as it translated into piracy for random, booty, and slaves. The NFL should pick a battle/campaign everyone can agree with and focus...

Or how about this one, the song of Sgt McKenzie:

I say we go full flagtard and use the Marine's hymn before every American game! Especially the part about the shores of Tripoli. We all know what that was about.

You're proving my point that nobody wants to talk about the elephant in the room. Given all the ways generals and presidents have used military personel, the flag has become something extremely vague. Nobody knows what it means. They hope it means something that stands up against...

Presumably the flag stands for all the battles fought to bring this nation to where it is now. Are you expecting the players to publicly display a favorable position for all battles, all campaigns, all manipulations, all bombs...all generals, all presidents? Tillman expressed an indiscriminate...

People argue about what is the appropriate response to the national anthem ritual. Nobody's talking about the appropriateness of the national anthem in the first place, prior to pro football games. People say, kneelers are politicizing an event where people just want to relax, eat hotdogs...

Trump pulled this ploy a year ago when Ryan was running up against Paul Nehlen last year, Nehlen being the most MAGA candidate for the Republicans. Let's see if Trump tries it again when Nehlen tries again. Basically, Trump was afraid Ryan would be re-elected House majority whip, and stand...

Nailed what? The article itself is a red herring...that whole approach to this issue. Agree Jones is way over complicating this...trying to cudgel the left with it. If Colin Kapernick represents the left, then maybe. But fact is, he started it in disgust about a plethora of YouTube vids...

I've got it! Let's compel all pro athletes to take a public loyalty test before they play each game. Oh wait. We already do that. I've got it! Let's say it's 1812, and the British are threatening to burn down the White House, and turn us into Canada or worse. Whose side would you fight on...

Someone is trying to make an equivalency between a ritualistic pre-game loyalty test to a necessary respect for military personnel, dead in battle, or still alive taking orders. If this is true, then it should be as easy to explain as 2 + 2. You've already told us it's not so easy to explain...

I've heard all the million dollar cry baby arguments. I haven't heard any that did the math that equivocates a public ritualistic loyalty test not related to the task at hand (the game) and disrespect for military personnel. You're saying you can't express it, but Twitter tweets can articulate...

Unable to use words to express the logic of how a public loyalty test (in regards the national anthem) translates into disrespect for military personnel, would you feel more able to express yourself if you had a gun in your hand and several buddies at your back?