Search results

That's a claim anyone could have made in constructing the Koran post-legend. Possibly there may have been a desert nomad who felt he was communicating with an angel, but what does an angel say to an illiterate nomad? Who knows! But anyone with an agenda, and a pen, can later, over the course...

For those nations, not yet conquered, who are willing to face the rash of data regarding the exploitation of soft targets by book-inspired warriors: "Islam" is a vague word. 'Koran' is more specific (although text can often be interpreted different ways). Separating Mohammed from the Koran...

Likewise, it could be stated, and made law, that Jesus did not write the bible, not even the 'new testament'...and that no phrase in the new testament is guaranteed to have been said by him. This puts the state in the role of governer, equalizing the threats against the state, equalizing the...

I consider nations to be akin to pirate ships. Because of circumstances, pirates ships had a form of governance similar to a constitution. There was a list of rules, and each pirate signed his 'x' to it (if he couldn't write his name). That's what everyone, theoretically, agreed to, if they...

For example, i would not be against having "Christians", who are applying for immigration admission, tear out the story of Sampson, spit on it, and toss it into a symbolic fire. Likewise "Jews". There are several more passages that don't belong in an America in which diverse cultures come to...

Well after reading Lysander Spooner a little bit, it's hard to call me a constitutionalist. But what is certain, is the Koran functions as a constitution. "But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain - that it has either authorized such a government as...

I would like to think that America was a place of refuge from such extremists, where "Muslims", who believe Mohammed was a good guy, can live without fear of being targeted by extremists who think Mohammed wrote the Koran. The reason for having them tear out passages of the Koran on camera...

I'm not against dealing with them and their book if there needs to be some sort of equality when adopting this measure. They, as well as the Jews, cling to the "old testament" which is problematic, as it is the book that the scribe(s) of the Koran plagiarized to come up with their own...

I propose that states differentiate between Mohammed and the Koran, stating, for the record, that there is no reason to believe that Mohammed wrote the Koran. There is plenty of evidence to suggest he did not. States could then suggest Mohammed was as benevolent as anyone wishes/believes him...

That's not on your talking points. Stick to your talking points. Don't try to get too fancy. Twisted. But not too twisted. Let the higher ups come up with the really twisted come backs.

No not a logical bind, a time bind. At some point it COSTS me to try to keep up with your word count, a count that looks more and more like it is supported by PAYMENT. So that would be unfair. Are you saying you are not sitting in a cubicle getting paid to argue all day? Now, Russians who...

Oh, this wouldn't have anything to do with Seagal's freindship with brother Russia would it?

It would be unfair if you were sitting in a cubicle, PAID to argue all day on forums like this...as i am NOT paid to keep up with your word count. I wouldn't be surprised if your ever expanding word count was aided by artificial intelligence (a bot). I think that is the real difference...

Is this an accusation, or is it self-admitted by Steven Seagal?

Getting back to the OP, sure, the FBI agents who, as lovers, were keeping a secret society (the two of them) apart from their spouses, JOKED about keeping a secret society apart from the agencies they were employed by. Did their secret society look like Shriners riding around on tricycles? No...

No, i mean talking points like, A.) In response to the #releasethememo campaign (social media trend), tell the American public that the Russian Federation is running that campaign. B.) With a straight face, tell the American public that this is a fact, which will explain why the pundits on...

Ad hominum. Not an argument. Well maybe the talking points are being put out by an actor(s) hostile to the election process of the United States...like some rogue moles deep in the CIA...or a secret society in the FBI. Likewise, if the pundit on the Joe Scarewierdo show did not state a fact...

So there IS a list of talking points that "ALL" major political news sites (which you don't watch) are adhering to? And from those talking points, you can be sure what the pundit said on the Joe Scareharrow show?

Wait, so you're saying someone who represents the Russian Federation created the perception that they had anywhere from some to all of the emails of a former Sec of State? And they sold that perception to Trump's son?

Not so fast there. You said, "What's being said is...", telling me what the pundit said on the Joe Scarebrow show. But now you say you don't even watch TV. So how do you know "what's being said"...unless you have a list of the same talking points?