Search results

For people who speak English as a first language, 'standard' is an easy to understand concept that means the law by which you judge others should be the law you are judged by. By extension it means do to others as you would have others do to you. Anything else is hypocrisy, as you seek to...

Non-US voters posting here should be held to their own standards. If you are a foreigner in regards US eligibility to vote, AND you uphold the MUELLER STANDARD, you should be banned for aggravated hypocrisy. This is the most obvious display of hypocrisy in all of Elite Trader Politics history.

Right. Now we know what you think of the people who have been liking your posts and helping you out.

If you were right, then Frederick Foreslight, a Canadian in command of the English language, would have come to your aid by now with some choice ad hominems. And none of the other Canadians and Brits here "like" what you compared them to either.

It's possible, even probable, that English is not your first language, which is why I believe you may be a second generation immigrant from a culture that really hates street dogs. But English is my first language, and you have not believably shown how you did not mean to compare Canadians and...

Your effort to hide behind a facade of logic only works if I had said something like: You said you were British. So your mom is a whore. That's an improper conclusion of similarities. Or, if I said: You are the child of incest, so you must be British. That too is a stretch that fits the...

I read up on it and found that you are stretching the analogy beyond its definition. It does not apply to the comparison you made between me calling you a Canuck/Brit (according to your own admission) and comparing that to as if I had called you a cuck, a pimp, your dad a pimp, your mom a...

I said you said you were a Canuck first, and now a Brit. You denied it and compared that to me calling you a cuck, your dad a pimp, and your mom a prostitute. Later you changed the comparison to me calling you and/or your dad a pimp, your mom a whore, and you to the child of incest. So the...

In the post I quoted you said you were first a Canuck, and now a Brit. When I said you said that, you compared it to me calling you a cuck, your dad a pimp, and your mom a prostitute.

No, not like the time you compared me saying you were Canadian or Brit was like saying you were a cuck, pimp, or your mother was a prostitute. To get to anything other than an addmission, you have to take your comment out of its context: a conversation between you and me, as I proposed, for the...

The context was a proposition that you could possibly be British. No assertions. Then you volunteered you were first Canadian now a Brit.

The admission that you were Canadian was unsolicited. So you lied? Or more satire?

Here's what I saw.

You seem to be saying anybody can say any outlandish thing about anybody, and then say they deleted posts. Your saying this is not a good way to conduct argument. But saying someone said they were Canadian based on what I saw is not outlandish, is not a smear, quite possible, and probable based...

So then the analogy would be me saying I'm Canadian, and then delete the post. Yes? There would be little to no evidence left. Then, you could say I said I'm Canadian, but deleted my post?

So you didn't compare me saying you are Canadian or Brit is like you saying I'm a cuck, me and my dad are pimps, and my mom is a prostitute?

Explain the analogy then. Show how you have not made that comparison.

You said that me calling you a Canadian or Brit is like you calling me a cuck, a pimp, and my mom a prostitute. As a Muslim living in the UK, that's how you might see the situation, but that's not how I see it. The way you speak, in conversation, reveals more than you are willing to admit.

Again, I have not compared Canadians and Brits to cucks and pimps. But a second generation Muslim, born in Canada, and who feels more at home in the UK might see things that way.

So your saying you could be Canadian or Brit on these boards, support Moooler, and NOT be a hypocrite, based on this argument?