Search results

It could be all good, and still have anchors covering the corporate ass under pressure. In doing so, Fox has to pretend that the most popular definition, according to the Urban Dictionary, is not most popular.

How do you know so much about strawman arguments?

Nope. On this one i chose not to look at any other opinions before commenting. I don't need to do that like you do.

This isn't Sarah Sanders posture. She left politely. She also politely reported on the matter (not an investigation). Now people can make up their minds what restaurants they want to go to. Done.

I see you are learning to wait for your 4 AM talking points instead of just waking up, triggered, and going off on your own little rants. So you've noticed that people, when they get frustrated and try to construct insults, tend to reveal things about their back-ground, upbringing, prejudices...

I would say yes they are, if they could recognize them in any way.

Then you shouldn't have a problem with the ethics of how Sanders responded, which helps you shop for the restaurants you want to patronize. The Red Hen in Lexington Virginia will lose some customers, and it will gain some (polarization). I'm wondering if I should advertise for bitcoin...

I get it, if you can make it to chapter 24 while completely ignoring the audience, you can get a Divinity Degree from Knox Theological Seminary that you can apply toward an assistant youth pastor position at one of the Christ-The-King mega-churches...and from there, work your way up?

Apparently the Talmud has more examples of supremacism than the Torah, which is consumed most by Gentile Judeo-Christians. But even in the Christian supplement ('new testament') there was a problem with Peter maintaining tradition of not eating with Gentiles, whenever there were Jews around...

You conveniently forget about the millions of children under 18 who are also American people but who didn't get to vote...even though the nation is borrowing from their future.

I consider this a deflection, and so, a loss.

That's what I said and meant. It may have swung it. Whatever was the effect, Comesky had much more influence than any number of Russians.

So you are officially conceding his point?

Besides the terrible campaign posture, yes, probably the next factor besides Trump's stellar campaign performance. It loomed like a dark cloud, was lifted, and then turned into an October/November surprise as Comesky painted himself into a corner where he had to say something about the Weiner...

No the Bengazi hearings brought to light her private server, raising questions of violations of the espionage act. Comesky bungled that, said some weird things in testimony, and kicked off congressional oversight campaign. Were you thinking Rosenstoned could run out the clock on all the oversight?

Follow-up question, are the 10-16 yr olds in your Sunday school class expected to raise their hands before asking a question?

I see, you are a Sunday school teacher blogging your talking points? The intended audience is between ages 10-16?

HereAgainstTrump, I don't think he can prevail with that argument: same as ATF pulling out badge after asked to leave. Neither the opposite corellary to the endorsement clause. If asked to leave because of government employment, it's fair government account be used to report the restaurants...

Not that I paid attention or cared at the time, but the Hillary hearings brought forth information that insured she would not become president. I believe it was something in the Coney hearing that launched Nunes' investigation.

It led to two days of congressional hearings, a subpoena on Strzok to testify, and turned the heat up on a probable impeachment of acting AG Rosenstoned, who lets Jeff "weed" Sessions concentrate on the big justice issues like weed...all in one week. You are too impatient.