Search results

Mark 10:23 And Jesus looked round about, and saith unto his disciples, How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God! 10:24 And the disciples were astonished at his words. But Jesus answereth again, and saith unto them, Children, how hard is it for them that trust in...

link

http://www.pricewatch.com/

that does not go as far as the essay did -- this is not an appropriate topic for discussion here, but suffice to say that a politician should be very careful tying AIDS rates to cultural and religious factors. without doubt. I still offer that the hatred directed toward the US is larger by...

it collectively attributes negative characteristics to a group based on race, religion, and national origin. whether or not it is "racist," it seems clear that if almost any other protected group were substituted for "middle-eastern" in this essay, it would have been clearly "racist" and unfit...

maybe that was Jose Maria Aznar dressed up in a military outfit, in hiding and afraid to go back to Spain after the Azores meeting. Actually a good move on Rumsfeld's part - if the war went badly he could have blamed it on Aznar, and then 80% of Americans would have supported a war on...

what reason could there have been for a maniacal serial murderer to destroy his own weapons on the eve of an invasion to remove him from power (an invasion caused by his refusal to surrender those same weapons)?

the proper term is "the coalition of the willing" -- to better distinguish it from the nations that have involuntarily joined to wage preemptive war.

hmm.. a third-party ad hominem. nice twist on an old theme :cool:

:confused:

you are kidding, right?

it seems definitely "racist,"* maybe not truly racist, though statements like this seem to come close: substitute "Africa" or "Latin America" or "Indian" for the middle east in that essay, and ask if that would be "racist," even including the "practical objective" qualifier... identical...

an interesting essay - a more direct statement of the neoconservative theory, based on a fundamental racist belief in middle-eastern inferiority, coupled with egotism, materialism, and nationalism. pointing out and discussing the unproven assertions and ridiculous assumptions would be futile...

second that. a very comprehensive reference. a simpler list of some strategies, online: http://www.optionsxpress.com/learn_strategies_longcall.htm

what's so bad about microsoft?

without a doubt. and the blame rests between the power-drunk judges that knowingly overstep their bounds and a public that is too ignorant to know any better.

whoa! - quite a story... it only takes a single mistaken encounter with law enforcement to illustrate the importance of due process, the right to a defense, the right to a public trial, and the genius of the men who created them.

agree 100% with your first paragraph. I have to object to the second, on behalf of the chicken. but if you could somehow secure the chicken's consent, then fine, have at it...

robbins won't come to his defense, just like santorum didn't come to lott's defense. robbins doesn't care about speech that's not his own, and for politicians, when someone's stuck in the media crosshairs, best to stay away - to defend thoughtcrime is to commit thoughtcrime. maybe the bush...