Search results

  1. T

    Hypothetically speaking, what if Trump or his proxies had colluded with the Russians?

    Who? The President? Probably because he cheated on this taxes years ago or lied on some form with his signature. Or, because he exaggerates so much his lawyers are telling him never speak to the prosecution. Maybe because his foundation lied. As far as collusion, I will go with what people...
  2. T

    Senate popular vote

    What are you talking about and what does it have to do with the existence of Republicans in L.A. or how black people are treated in Mammoth Lakes? Your post sure seems to be strong candidate for another post from your PPPP.
  3. T

    The Scaravan

    Not that I watch but did they report on Trump's press conference? I just checked and there is a new story on Fox. And apparently per your article they did discuss it on Fox and friends. more fake news from the left
  4. T

    Hypothetically speaking, what if Trump or his proxies had colluded with the Russians?

    1. We were not arguing about Jr.s liability. So good luck with that. 2. Your comment makes no sense. Your side was alleging crimes by the President. I asked for the statute. Why would I bring up a statute if I am not alleging crimes?
  5. T

    Hypothetically speaking, what if Trump or his proxies had colluded with the Russians?

    Don't you get it yet? I have not alleged on this thread that Hillary did anything illegal. But, if there were some illegal collusion, what Hillary did was much more likely to be illegal than what Trump did. Don Jr. taking a meeting and getting nothing is not like getting the dossier dirt from...
  6. T

    Hypothetically speaking, what if Trump or his proxies had colluded with the Russians?

    I did not say she did anything illegal. That is why I asked your side to define illegal collusion. Go ahead define it. Then we can talk about whether paying for oppo research from Russian spies via your own paid foreign spy is illegal.
  7. T

    Hypothetically speaking, what if Trump or his proxies had colluded with the Russians?

    All you had to do was go through this list and answer the questions. But you refused... So don't wonder why the thread was derailed. You chose to go with loaded b..s from post one.
  8. T

    Hypothetically speaking, what if Trump or his proxies had colluded with the Russians?

    Did Clinton finance the dossier? It was therefore under almost every possible legitimate scenario hers. Go ahead using the principles of Agency law distinguish Hillary's culpability for crimes (if any) from Trump's (if any) . Now... you fairly conclude neither is legally culpable for any...
  9. T

    Hypothetically speaking, what if Trump or his proxies had colluded with the Russians?

    The two foreign trolls bring up whataboutism as they refuse to understand they derailed their own thread. You can't have conversation with leftist trolls who refuse to define the crimes and the elements of the crimes. And for morons who don't comprehend agency law... you will always get...
  10. T

    Mueller's team has started writing its final report

    Screaming what about does not change facts.
  11. T

    Hypothetically speaking, what if Trump or his proxies had colluded with the Russians?

    How did Hillary's agents get info on Trump if they did not "collude" with Russian agents? If you need the legal definition of principal and agent look it up before posting.
  12. T

    Hypothetically speaking, what if Trump or his proxies had colluded with the Russians?

    The republicans funded opposition research. The dossier came about from Clinton funds and maybe FBI funds.
  13. T

    Senate popular vote

    Oh look its the old make up shit and then distract by turning into Piezoe's Posting Pinhead Persona.
  14. T

    Swiss "Socialist Paradise" Approves 'Universal Basic Income' Of $2,750 A Month

    At this stage with so many Americans now into free stuff, I don't think beating our heads against the wall for smaller govt is going to work. The cronies want drones and the drones want free stuff. Unless we get the money out of politics the 70 percent of the country who believes in work and...
  15. T

    Hypothetically speaking, what if Trump or his proxies had colluded with the Russians?

    First you need to explain what you mean by collusion. Then you have to define illegal collusion. Then you have to tell what the crime would be. Then you have to show that Trump was connected. Then you would have to explain that getting campaign intelligence on the other side is illegal and...
  16. T

    Mueller's team has started writing its final report

    So do any of the myraid lefty commentators and faux legal brains who told us that Mueller can and will indict a sitting President want to make revised statements. It looks to me these propagandists will be wrong on 2 counts. 1. That Trump will be prosecuted while President. Not for collusion...
  17. T

    Perhaps Yesterdays most interesting fall - RBG's

    Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 85, was rushed to a hospital after fracturing three ribs in a fall at the court. “Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg fell in her office at the Court last evening. She went home, but after experiencing discomfort overnight, went to George Washington University...
  18. T

    Don't Forget How Evil Establishment Republicans Are

    What is funny is that the lefties here just ape their talking points about gerrymandering. No thought or concession is given to the fact that gerrymandering has been done by both sides and not only is it difficult to objectively determine unfair gerrymandering it is even more difficult to...
  19. T

    Senate popular vote

    I knew Mammoth Mountain and therefore Mammoth Lakes well back in the 90s and first part of the 2000s. My wife or my brother and I were up almost every weekend in the winter and we would visit in the Summer. We almost bought a house there right when the resort was sold by the McCoys. I never...
  20. T

    Motel 6 agrees to pay $8.9M to settle claims it helped ICE arrest guests

    You typed buzz words but you conveyed no useful information. What are you attempting to highlight? If you are complaining about a surveillance state... and support Constitutional rights... welcome to our side. If you are claiming law enforcement violated constitutional rights you are...
Back
Top