Ain't it amazin'. One fellow calls the other a "Worthless POS" during one phase of a campaign... only to be endorsed by the other in a later campaign.
Is there any TRUTH/HONESTY ANYWHERE?? (Probably why I like dogs....no "false admiration for an objective", no deception, no "turncoat"... no...
Sometimes it is. Many software packages have SAR tool. It DOES get you on the right side of a big move fairly quickly... at the cost of enduring some whipsawing.
Haven't ever tested it to see if SAR is overall beneficial, but I suspect it is if one can handle the whips.
Video: Denver Gives Sanctuary To Illegal Drug Traffickers
Courts starting to allow illegal immigrants privileges to send in pleas for lesser crimes
Democrat politicians turn Denver into a Sanctuary City to protect illegal immigrants from deportation while at the same time creating a safe haven...
"...Scientists are all seemingly on the same page for once and declaring that the sun’s decreased output could fling Earth into a mini ice age. The scientists determined, based on 20 years of observations and collected data, that the sun will be nearly seven percent cooler and dimmer by 2050...
Probably right, considering that he did it a 2nd time. Funnier still, he wasn't freaked about it. More like, "Look at me... I've got a bucket stuck on my face and you don't". (He's more of a comedian than the intellectual type.)
All part of the Lefties' devious plan.
House electoral votes are reallocated based upon population... not by registered voters. California will eventually have a bigger say in the government just because they get allocated more house seats. Illegals count the same as anyone else.
Let's assume your proposition is correct.
Wouldn't you get the same message from Price TA at the same time... making any volume consideration at best redundant?
What do you do when price turns and the "volume is a whimper" instead of presumedly climactic?
Years ago, about 90% of the volume was retail. (Volume may have been more useful then.... and still may be on individual issues. But what about "the market"... stock indices?)
Then it shifted to be...
That's half of the definition of gambling. The other half is "the payout is less than the probability of win". The gambler is hoping to prevail in spite of the odds being against him.
Trading is not gambling. The trader is not "hoping to beat fixed odds against him".
Must have been in your imagination.
The probability of hitting any one number is 1:38. They payout is 35:1. Those odds are fixed and cannot be altered by the player. Any strategy which seems to work (semi or otherwise) is random.
“I decided one day to just eliminate white people from my personal life…”
https://www.infowars.com/vice-claims-black-women-fleeing-america-to-escape-white-people/
What? Whitey's money not good enough for you any more? Fine. Round up all of your America-hating friends, and take them with you.