Search results

I'll be shocked if that happens. Then again, this gap up is kind of weak--taking us, as it did, only to the October highs. In other words, there's nothing clarifying about it--yet. We remain in the same giant range, just at the extreme upper end right now, which leaves the mean regression...

Honestly, I think the Chinese government caught everyone by surprise. It's a game-changer, and the players are still sorting out how to position themselves.

1) slight net selling, with size, although that's shifted since i posted 2) ndx/spx

I'm puzzled by what I see here 1) distribution nq/es 2) accumulation index components don't know what to make of it at the moment.

we're starting to rotate lower not that it means jack

Does anyone trade the Paris Bourse anyway?

y'think?

sure. but there are more buyers.

oh never mind

short 1275.25

+1. And, yes, you're right, the word's usage has morphed its meaning.

Yes, I've been wondering the very same thing.

in germany, it does, actually. in the u.k., it did not, quite clearly. as for the u.s....?

time to short

anyway...

My guess is that we close at the highs...and that this will be a nasty little setup for tomorrow's pre-market numbers. But it's just a guess.

I buy my books at the local bookstore because I want to support the local bookstore.

Wow. Ok, then. In the old days, journalists prided themselves on independent-mindedness and other such notions and left faux-populism to the pols. How quaint.

when do markets climb out of holiday mode? this is excruciating

Good point. Yes, I suppose it is. Having said that, I haven't seen such particularly consistent cant in NYT--and by that, I mean the consistent use of phraseology in "b-matter" (journalism-speak for the boilerplate background info. used in stories). Furthermore, LATimes' position on...