Search results

This sounds like a long lost poster... Wally's back????

This is true. The Arabs at one time were great inventors. But once Islam took over the region...... What have y'all done again????????

Goodyear screwed the pooch. Tire wear is still a question mark for the COT. Fine. But to get it that wrong is a disgrace. But NASCAR f'ed it up too. They should have said enuf of the yellows after half way and let the teams figger it out. What were they doing, 3-4 yellow laps and then 8...

I think he sponsored a Busch car for a lot of years???? So he's got some experience at the race game. Isn't he partially sponsoring a Sprint Cup car next year????

They all have their own accounts, and I trade it for them through the use of what IB calls a master account. Basically, I trade futures for them, and there's a deal where you dictate how many contracts each separate account buys/sells when you hit the transmit button. So if my default is say 30...

This is the best way to go, IMHO. 1- everyone has their own acct. 2- everyone pays their own taxes. 3- everyone can withdraw funds whenever they want, with no internal balancing with the other partners. 4- anyone can quit whenever they want to go trade themselves. I do this now for my...

LOL... Pot, meet kettle...

This is typical of those with Bush Derangement Syndrome. Since they can't touch the fact that Saddam was paying suicide bmber's families $25k, or that he was breaking conditions of their surrender, or that they were delaying entry into various facilities to UN inspectors, they try and deflect...

Well, you obviously think that your opinion matters, otherwise you wouldn't be posting about it. And no, it's not moot since you've been posting about it. Everyone's opinion matters Ka-boomdog. No one exists in a bubble.

Well, you seem to be buying into SOME theory, at any rate. What it is... is still pretty murky. What I find most interesting about our exchange is the way you've avoided the facts I posted regarding Saddam's terrorist backing and their surrender conditions. These are not in dispute...

So how does her motives have anything to do with "powerful forces"? Explain who these powerful forces are, if you don't mind. Cuz the 2 seem to be at odds since she's nothing in the big picture....

No, that's not my meaning at all. Rather, that maybe, just MAYBE, your mindset is already that you wouldn't accept a rejection of impeachment proceedings if the Judiciary Committee decided that there isn't anything there. Enlighten me if I'm wrong.

Ahh, but it does answer the original question does it not? That is, this MIGHT be in retaliation to Clinton's impeachment. Gotta remember that Pelosi and whole lot of other Dems were in office during this period. And pols have a looooong memory, senor. Bush has called out "the Dem...

You don't have an answer, do you? See, this is typical. The only way to answer this would mean that you need to use the Inflationary Model. That means you will have a statement. I will question it, and the only way to counter my questions will be to inflate the conspiracy to include more...

You're one of those NWO wackos, eh? Here's a question - if the goal of the NWO is for everyone to "don't worry, be happy sheep", then what possible good is it to let this whole thing happen? All it does is make people more suspicious of people in the guv, which presumably wouldn't be the goal...

Sounds to me like you're not really interested in an investigation. Sounds like you've already made up your mind regarding WMD's, and that's fine. But that wasn't the only reason for invading Iraq. It's indisputable that Saddam was paying suicide bomber's families $25k. That makes him a...

Perhaps the most bizarre outcome :D of the whole thing was that when Monica's dad found out the truth about what had been going on - that his daughter was givin hummers to Bill, and that he didn't even know her name for quite a while - he still gushed about what a great human being Bill...

You've still got it wrong. The investigation wasn't about his playing grab ass. It was about a credible accusation of rape against Clinton, a charge that in his position as Prez, didn't protect him. And if I remember right, nobody looked into the grab ass thing until some other broad...

C'mon, Clinton wasn't impeached for playing grab ass. He was impeached for lying to court officials while investigating an accusation of raping one of his staff.

You da man... :cool: