Search results

You make a great point. Your comment certainly applies to many of the people and politicians who feel the need to constantly remind everyone how smart they are.

Actually, just being for smaller, less intrusive gov earns you those titles by many in the left.

How do you keep it from being politicized? You illustrated why it's so easily politicized in these two separate comments.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/07/the_good_news_rubios_eligible.html Now, consider Marco Rubio. His parents were resident aliens when he was born in 1971, seeking and soon to receive their status as naturalized U.S. citizens. Under the Fourteenth Amendment, "all persons born...in the...

Add Rubio to the mix and I'd vote for the ticket without holding my nose.

I don't have an issue with a reduced amount of warheads in our arsenal providing we don't underfund missile defense and associated research. A successful missile defense system would act as a deterrent from a hostile country that would foolishly believe just having more nukes creates a...

http://www.marklevinshow.com/home.asp

Don't be so sure. He showed his hand. Why should he now be trusted regarding this issue? On the other hand, all may be forgotten by the end of the next episode of American Idol.

I feel that way about anyone handling my food.

That would be one hell of a play.

Even if he walks it back, would he regain the support he lost because of this decision? I'm not an Obama fan, but if I was and my vote changed because of his decision, I would still be concerned that if re-elected to a second term, he would bring it right back when he had nothing to lose...

Obama just pissed on the Catholic voting bloc. RCG has been posting some very accurate thoughts regarding the risk of that. Santorum strikes me as the most religious candidate, though I'm not sure if he is Catholic or not, but the timing of this sweep and the timing of the anger stirred up in...

I'd be lying if I told you that you weren't pretty funny from time to time. I actually wouldn't mind having discussions with you either, if you were capable of leaving the arrogance I spoke about behind.

I have no one on my ignore list. Since the subject of ignoring was brought up, let’s take a look at it. When it comes to progressives and their techniques for debating, it should be obvious to most that they often ignore the elements of the argument they can’t possibly win. Not a...

I'm surprised this wasn't brought up more during the debates. In fact, I don't remember hearing anyone talk about it at all. "Obama Could Alter Stance of Federal Appeals Courts" http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Obama-Judges/2012/02/05/id/428500

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2004/apr/15/20040415-094758-5267r/ He may own it, but you can't claim he allowed it, unless you think he should have brought the country to a standstill on one of many threats. Had it not been for the wall, it may have been prevented.

I read the thread. Did you read about the wall? Obviously not.

Maybe you should spend an evening with your search engine before making such ludicrous claims. Start with Jamie Gorelick and the Clinton Admin before stating Bush allowed the attack to occur.

I see you are now looking in the mirror. You may want to check your spelling again. Payback's a bitch, isn't it?

I'll just use your previous quote to respond. [/b]