Search results

Ok, just another simple question from a simple mind. I'm sure you'll have no problem with this one. Where did this other "poster" say that gravity was "constant" and where did I come in to "defend it"? Please post the link. STILL WAITING TM JB

Ok, just another simple question from a simple mind. I'm sure you'll have no problem with this one. Where did this other "poster" say that gravity was "constant" and where did I come in to "defend it"? Please post the link. Still waiting TM. JB

TM: >I like how you avoided my questions though We will definitely get to any questions you may have in a moment, but first since I am so simple minded I have to make sure we have one simple fact straight first. TM: >Sorry, you didn't say it was a constant... >another poster did but...

Hmmm...TM replies to Longshot but not yet to me. Interesting. JB

You're a red blooded *ASS* Pound. JB

TM: >Im asking simple questions because you >seem like a simple minded person >snip< >You said Gravity was constant.....now >your saying its different... Ok TM, since you want to play simple, I'll just ask you one *SIMPLE* question. Where did I said gravity was "constant"? Please...

AAA: >I'm relatively sure there are reasonable explanations >for most of these questions, but of course in hindsight >it is easy to turn simple mistakes into monumental >incompetency. I don't think those questions are aimed at exposing incompetency, I think they clearly are attempting...

TM: >Just checking with you since you are an expert......Is >gravity the same on every single planet? and on >the moon?????.....If not then why is it such a >'constant'??? First, I'm far from an "expert" but so far we are only talking high school level physics so I can at least keep...

TM: >so if i can show you pictures of the *effects* >of God.....you will believe in God?..... Well, first there can be an inference in that statement that the only evidence that we have of gravity would be pictures of the effects (which of course is nonsense), but I'll take your question...

Wow, TM sure held is own in the whole "god vs gravity" exchange. Someone please remind me of who I'm dealing with next time before I attempt to engage such a articulate and well versed opponent. I'm bushed. JB

ART: >Love isn't "practical." Nor is artistic expression. >Nor is singing. If such is your world, I truly feel sad for you. JB

TM: >Show me a picture of Gravity.... By his comments and questions something leads me to believe that TM is a few bricks shy of a load when it comes to proofs. One can show pictures of the *effects* of gravity, wind, heat, etc. Since these have proven to be infinitely (so far)...

Me: >For me, gravity performs as expected each and every >time...after time after time. I can test it in the lab or in >my everyday life and it never fails me. TM: >Really? Yes. >Ok....drop a feather and a stone....do they both >land?... In the absence of wind currents, yes...

>I believe in the theory of gravity but if we put it >through the same stringent tests as they put God >through it won't pass Now that's a crock. Here is only one of *my* "stringent" tests... For me, gravity performs as expected each and every time...after time after time. I can...

I think he wants to look foolish. I'll let him. JB

>More inherent than what? Than question 1. JB

Me: >Are you pointing out the obvious irrational nature of the >need to have a relationship 'sanctioned' by an external >entity, or are you pointing out something more inherent >to the relationship? ART: >Try a direct one concept question rather than >compound if want clarity...

Me: >Are you pointing out the obvious irrational nature of the >need to have a relationship 'sanctioned' by an external >entity, or are you pointing out something more inherent >to the relationship? ART: >Try a direct one concept question rather than >compound if want clarity...

Me: >Are you pointing out the obvious irrational nature of the >need to have a relationship 'sanctioned' by an external >entity, or are you pointing out something more inherent >to the relationship? ART: >I am pointing what is a fact for many married men. Yes, I gathered that was...

ART: >many things in life are not rational. If you are married >you would know that. Are you pointing out the obvious irrational nature of the need to have a relationship 'sanctioned' by an external entity, or are you pointing out something more inherent to the relationship? JB