Search results

Rat: >what i found humorous was that gg got his panties >all bunched up because the principle he is defending >this time is protecting satanism. You just perfectly demonstrated how you DON'T recognize the principle, but are instead focusing on the specific. Inherent to the principle GG...

Praise be. JB

Who's the idiot here???? You can't keep your point straight... First you say that GG's upset because "satanism is at risk". Now, when I say that you missed his point completely and that actually his point likely has nothing to do with any particular religion being at risk, but rather it's a...

I'll bet GG holds no candle for wicca and I'm quite certain that it is the inconsistent application of a principle that is got GG bent out of shape here. There are few better examples of the blindness involved than you're inability to recognize that very thing. JB

In many ways I agree here with Spike. What is most important to me is whether that one second turns into 30 during a data crunch. From my experience...Q&E = yes. TAL = no (usually) JB

We use TAL to feed our trading computer -- no other retail provider has been able to keep up as well in the open crunch (we are often tracking over a thousand stocks on a tick by tick level at the open). We use Qcharts for historical. I have a buddy who used Esignal for years and we were...

Me: >I can't quickly calc the number of listed shares we've >moved (millions upon millions) just in the last few months >using SMART with no problems. da-net: >Your reply of "we've" implied to me that you are >either a BD or a stockbroker or a very large >investment group...

Me to Mr. da-net >>Are you on crack? da-net: >No, but I do appreciate your concern for my health. and later in the same post, na-net: >Again, let me thank for being so concerned about my health. That would be strike three when it comes to the accuracy of your assumptions on this...

dim: >P.S We know IB is highly respected broker in U.S and also >we are quite sure we will respect them, once this intersting >problem is solved and compensated. I'm sure the "problem" will be solved. Unfortunately, I'm betting that IB will never be compenstated as you don't seem like...

da-net: >What the thread starter is asking for is >a level playing field, Phlub: >I was not trying to make any kind of statement >about "level playing fields, etc." No balls, two strikes on da-net. JB

Phlub: >Another person said that this feature can serve you well - >and you are correct as long as the stock has a ton of >liquidity on the ECN's and regionals. I am that "other person", and again I don't wish to say or imply that your experiences or conclusions are faulty regarding...

Mr. da-net Are you on crack? Where did you get the wild a** notion that I am not a retail customer? You certainly didn't get it from anything I've ever written here on ET. What a mighty swing and a total miss that was on your part. For the record - I am not, nor never have been a BD...

Not to deny anyone's personal experience, but I can't quickly calc the number of listed shares we've moved (millions upon millions) just in the last few months using SMART with no problems. Considering others experiences, I guess one must decide whether the added liquidity and accompanying...

chit chat thread

chit chat thread

How about you learn to read it right the first time rather than accuse someone of edits? "Come, on." JB PS: check my post time...hour edit time had already elapsed before I even saw/responded to your silly post.

I said: >Anyway, I share about 1/10,000ths of your pain >RM. It was a bad day for me too. lol Yes, $250 and 2.5 million. What part of 1/10,000ths don't you understand. JB

ROFLAO (not at you RM). I have a parallel to Rearden: Jan 3, 2001 was my first day EVER of trading real money (had been paper trading previously) I was doing the safe newbie thing and just trading in and out of CSCO 100 shares to learn about order routing -- wasn't trying to make (or...

TGS: >I'm totally confused why you would rip us publicly >for not having a phone number (clearly on our >home page), You know, if you were a little more honest (or at least careful) in your answers you might look a little more...well -- honest and careful. Unlike what you accuse him...

Pabst: >Besides, why should a merchant have to >serve as an unpaid tax collector for the >Federal government. WTF were you thinking when you made that statement Pabst??? Merchants/businesses *already* act as unpaid tax collectors for the Federal government...it's called payroll...