Search results

Wrong. PS. I have a 600+ Million H$ account at HSX.

Time to drop da ET :cool:

You have 2 base systems: 1. Trend-following. 2. Mean Rev. Plus. Each system overrides itself, under specific circumstances. So you'll end up testing: System 1. System 2. System 1 + 2. (aka. System 3) All the shit you've been writing about doesn't matter. You still don't...

OK... Seemingly, you've gotta major problem comprehending English so I'm going to conclude that you're a retard or just plain ol' non-American (In that case, I'll take back the retard). Which part of "useless" don't you get? Why would I waste time "handling shit" that I find useless...

For starters.... I didn't know what "ad hominem" and "onus probandi" so I wasted time Googling what it meant... Next... I know what you are talking about. You don't have to reword the things you wrote but to put things into perspective: 1. (Copy& Pasting) Each system subscribes to the...

First, there really isn't a point of talking about how people pick signals out. Few reasons to this: 1. The reason people pick signals from a system is because there is a discretionary aspect involved with the trading one does. Obviously, a Black Box (fully automated) systems and Grey Box...

What's beyond retarded... A monkey??? RFT... let me translate it so that you can understand... ukayakyakakyakakakakayakkaykayakyakayayakykaykayakyakyakayakayakyaykaa... uga uga uga uga wok wok wok uga woku gaokwu gaokue ogakue... Fuckin' Soros my ASS.

We've got a retard in the house...

1. You have to be testing your models or systems considering those slippage on Stop/Market orders or non/partial fills for Limit orders. Of course, there can never be a testing engine which can simulate "EXACTLY" what the market may have done, but you can put in measure to put them into...

I do know. But not ALL.

"I" (nitro), I always had a sense about you that, you're trying to do everything too much... In the bigger world, we have people paid well to figure out all your concerns. There's more value to a "Specialist" than a "Jack-of-all-trades" because you can never beat a full time Fin. IT...

Paranoia is a bitch. Stop trading if you don't like it.

I'm blaming it on the turkey...

I admit that I diversify my models. So I have no style, and I prefer things to be that way. I know that I'm "wise" enough not to start a dumb ass thread like you. OK? Next.

If you can't program or hire someone full time to do it for you, the trader will not make it as a systematic trader. PERIOD. Good luck with churning newbs into losers during changing markets.

Having a "style" and declaring one is basically a "limitation". It can be based skils, knowledge, environment or even worse, what you are placing yourself. In another words, you're curve-fitting a "style" with the market. Seriously, you probably fall into one of the "majority of...

All markets are different. Does ES vs. Pork Belly difference be a surprise for you? If not, why wouldn't ES vs. NQ be any different. It's all relative and a matter of degree.

The real holy grail is the ability to test and develop models quickly and efficiently.

The Risk/Reward increases to 2.0 after doubling the size??? Or wait... maybe he has a $Value stop or something... Of course, that'll make it a whole different system profile and be completely irrelevant to the examples the OP provided... The biggest paradox is the OP's stupidity....

Take the job. I'll stop trading on my own (and do IT or quant.) for a few years to get connected with those guys. But this really is subjective... what do you want in your career? If you want to be their port. manager or in-house prop. (the term trader is very broad... you can be a desk...