Search results

lol good call.

Your site is sht.

You should see the PMs.

I use goto.com meeting and webinar. Lost the Cloud yesterday which forced local downloads of meetings. Last straw. It's $39 for the two (minimum spec). No Cloud limits but otherwise a sht service.

Unblocked.

I remember that story.

Shhh!

lol they filled him at a 20% premium on his odd lot. Karen is going to call WF on a 4yo fill. I love it. They are going to tell him to take his cash account to RH.

@overwatch doesn't trade.

The two dimwits are blocked from this thread. I'll be more active here.

no.

100K registered to vote this week. 20% under the age of 21...

45. On or about December 26, 2018, at approximately 9:52 a.m. defendant LEFT posted on the Citron Twitter Account, with a link to a Citron report on FB: “$FB Backing up the sleigh. $160 tgt. Citron presents the only information that counts on $FB looking past the rhetoric. Would you rather have...

The expectancy, not the pricing model. The fly pic shows the payoff at maturity.

The fly PNL is nearly-symmetric from 112. It's a + expectancy due to the fly-bump. Run a monte carlo sim when you finish that arithmetic.

Well the complex thing is infinitely better and near RT-neutral vega but I take issue with this thread/title. Only addicts knowingly act contrary to self interest (basically all of ET); so who is going to take a pick-'em payoff at -edge? And you gotta stop with these clickbaity threads bc they...

RUOK? The risk is symmetric. It's essentially a corridor long (fly) and the complex position (TOS pic) is >4/1 return at tails. Where do see 375 risk to make 125? Miss second grade math?

Bull skew lock in NVDA (3-term) and index hedge. trivial long vega but left tail volcorr and upside sticky D on index. Correlation risk but it's an arb.

The TOS stress is a 4/1 return. The Hanweck (top) is simply a exp plot of a vertical (fly) and 1/1 risk at the tails but +exp due to the fly bump.