Search results

The problem with almost any deep OTM strategy is that the spreads and transaction cost become a significant percentage of your total entry cost. The options pricing would have to be way off to make up for that.

The rate is an annualized rate, so you'd have to prorate the .95% to get your daily rate. You're only charged if you hold overnight. Keep in mind that the fee changes almost daily.

Just to make sure I understand, you're using a graph of the past to predict future events but saying that contradictory evidence on said graph should be ignored because it was different times? You got the "different times" part right, that's why blindly interpolating the future from graphs in...

Looks like percentage wise households had a larger lead over everyone else from 1992-2000. Using that as an indicator would have led you to go short in 92 and miss a huge bull market. We may or may not be in a bubble, but hindsight graphs like this are of limited predictive value in determining it.

Nice detective work. With a float this small on a thinly traded stock this kind of research can pay off. You may be the only person who both noticed this and did the digging to figure out what was going on. Of course you were generous enough to share with us all, but if you found this one you'll...

Back to the original point of the thread. Is it any wonder that the more educated, better traveled, more open minded millennials have abandoned this cesspool of nativist, judgmental, grumpy old white men who are hypocritical enough to judge the brown skin "taker" who doesn't share their religion...

Again the problem with words and their meanings with this one. I'd actually never heard of the word "mangina" so I did what intelligent people do when they don't know something, I looked it up. And the definition I found was "A homosexual or bisexual man's anus and rectum", or just to spell it...

That was certainly true as recently as 3 years ago, but I've been told it is no longer the case. Do you have any recent experience (or talked to anyone with recent experience) there? I haven't personally tried, although I was just there so I suppose I should have given it a shot just to see.

Like I've told you before der_kommissar, in my world accusing someone of being homosexual is about as insulting as accusing them of being left handed. Your continued use of it says far more about you than me.

I think the opening a bank account for your offshore entity is the non-trivial piece here. That is far harder than incorporating offshore.

What a very thoughtful, albeit a bit bizarre, personal attack. We're all better off with your wisdom to guide us.

And that's the difference between you and I.

Or it's just how they choose to wear their hat, something that we're all free to do however we want here in the United States of America and certainly not something you get to form a value judgement on and still be taken seriously by anyone.

Still ignoring those pesky facts? And we've devolved to name calling. You've exposed your true colors, so we're done here.

Actually you started the thread posted a provocative claim that millennials are somehow good for nothing because of how they wear their hats, and when you're called out on it you want to claim some kind of veto on logic because you started the thread!

I'm sorry, that whole part about the gdp per capita of the poorest states in the country aligning with the amount they "take" versus what they give aligning with their red state status, all feelings right? Or are you ignoring that because it doesn't fit with your preconceived "feeling" that poor...

What's with this fetish about personally housing people. For the last time, they didn't need me or the government to house them, nor were they here illegally! And while your personal housing situation is really irrelevant, given your housing fetish it seems suspicious that you refuse to answer...

So you just asked me "How many of those immigrants you personally took in at your house?", now you say "you personally don't want to house them but you want the country as a whole to do that." Except I want no such thing, like I said the people I know no more need me or our country to house them...

Well we established that according to MoneyMatthew the problem is all these "takers". I established that these "takers" primarily live in poor southern states (perhaps in trailer parks, but I'll admit that's a bit of rhetorical flourish on my part). So the "problem" according to MoneyMatthew is...

Oh, I'm sorry. You weren't talking about trailer parks with white folks in them, were you. You were talking about dark skinned immigrants with maybe a few black inner city folks thrown in. I'm sorry, I was just using that whole data and math thing, it can be confusing.