Search results

inputs: Price( Close ), Length( 9 ), Displace( 0 ), upcol( green), dncol( red ); variables: WMA( 0 ) ; condition1 = Displace >= 0 or CurrentBar > AbsValue( Displace ) ; if condition1 then begin WMA = WAverage( Price, Length ) ; if WMA > WMA[1] then SetPlotColor(1...

Why would you even entertain the thought of people getting rid of you? Perish that thought now or you will dig yourself in. (I know of one other person who had that thought.) mmm... the problem is rooted deeper than I thought.

I would not even imagine you do not believe in this system. If you have jumped to such a conclusion through erroneous extrapolations and assumptions, please put that thought away now. How I feel about you should not be a factor in your success.

I don't think thought-provoking disagreement was ever an issue in this forum. I do think it is trouble when you feel people are ganging up on you. The answer given might not be the one you like to hear, but I don't think you have to take it the negative way.

I know of a few people who believe the number one way to validate a system is to convince a detractor or even an unbeliever. Some even asked to see the blotter, execution report, T&S, video, live calls, etc.

I know of only one other person who called Spyder a teacher, and demanded a teacher do what a teacher should do.

I am sorry to hear this is how you see the event around Bundlemaker. I followed the discussion as it happened, and that is not how I saw it. I will not get into a discussion about him in here (it is not productive), but I do see the similar path you are taking. The following is not directed...

or... it does not matter WHAT it is that you called "right", it is whether you are in sync with the market's projected message.

This is a pattern I observed: A question was asked, 1. Spyder gives a straight answer The answer was not fully understood, or new questions/issues arise from the answer... more questions were asked. 2. Spyder gives an expanded answer Based his own past experience, someone jumps...

This thread presents a different challenge than last year's journal. Last year we all started at the same footing -- knowing very little about the method, and had to follow a strict syllabus of progress. This thread is supposed to be a refinement of what we have learnt. But I see...

If you know what signal you are looking for, there is no reason to act before it arrives.

first learn to trade, then learn to scale. p.s. this simple answer has more meaning than it appears.

snatched it somewhere... worth a reread.

Sigh...

<img src="http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=1803735">

Both OQ and NT supports C#. Does it mean that a strategy written for OQ can run in NT ?

Nice first try. This is not a comprehensive list. i.e. if you haven't worked out all the detail, you are likely to run into the same question again. Do one thing at a time: focus on tapes first. Here are some combinations you can work toward: 1. =H, =L (=equal) 2. =L, HH 3. HH, HL...

Why are you not following the business plan outlined in the first post? You are supposed to make one trade of 10 YM contracts.

This is the 1st step in the M phase. We are trying to list out everything we see... including things that might or might not be of use. What else do you see?