Search results

Gosh, never look at that tbh. If it's meant to be, it will come through.

3,900 SPX

Everyone has their way of setting targets, I know that B1 has a fluid one, not predefined by any level, he looks at price behaviour, I like to go with 50% of whatever previous range you are looking at, so I would set a target close to that 50% of the previous range, therefore initiating a long...

As the English would say - you can't have your cake and eat it too!

Since you are good at stats, have you considered only trading high-probability signals based on past performance? This way, you would not be overtrading. I have one such signal which is currently in play. The current signal is not perfect by my definition, but very close to being one, that's the...

I am yet to meet such traders. What is consistent in your view, what win rate assuming what r:r ratio?

You could do well and there are some non-pros (who don’t trade OPM) who made very well out of trading, but there are not many of them and these traders have likely eased their their risk strategies substantially to achieve this. Most of us would risk 2-5% of trading capital, to return similar %...

To me, comparison between retail trading and printing money would indicate that risk of a loss is non-existent. This is simply not true. Risk is always there. Only insider trading, which is illegal, can be comparative to printing money. Why each individual trade is a mindfuck is related to the...

I have never heard of any retail trader that printed money via trading, each trade is a psychological mindfuck ;)

Reading price action isn’t rocket science, all else is unpredictable. All you can do is have great risk management skills and either bank more winners by accepting smaller reward or having fewer winners but making a killing when you occasionally nail a move. Who is printing money in retail...

sure (eyeroll). Nobody has a crystal ball, not a single person on this planet. It’s not a matter of opinion, it’s fact. Some traders have better win rates than others, but they still have losses.

If price action was never to mislead, then it would be highly predictable, which it isn’t, come on man.

oh but they do though.

Whether it was a fake move or not, we will find out in days/weeks to come. Markets don’t work in straightforward ways which would make then highly predictable.

It could only happen, IMHO, if we get a black swan. So far this has been nothing more than a discounting event, orderly decline, nothing like when C19 struck.

Certainly, side by side comparison of the two documents would point to one being a fake. But the sceptic in me suggests that this is exactly why they would do it that way to then say, look at this POS, clearly it’s a fake, it doesn’t even look like our presentation.

Will SPX make it to 3,806 today? Seems far fetched, but hope dies last.

I personally believe this to be genuine, of course RAND denied existence of this document, up to an individual to decide whether genuine or not. It’s happening now already, believing that US doesn’t instigate events like in the present times, to ensure its own prosperity, would be extremely naive.