Search results

I gotta wonder how much toadies like jem get paid to shill for the fossil fuel industries or is he stupid enough to do all this dancing and prancing for free.

The Ukrainian SAMs are Soviet-era. Almost nobody in NATO believes they are operational (e.g., dead batteries).

Tougher than trading? Surely you jest. For most of those assclowns, politics is a con game, not a tough game. Just convince enough suckers you've got their best interests in mind and they vote for you, not unlike huckstering trading books and expensive trading courses to the gullible.

Check my previous posts in this forum, asswipe. I've already posted evidence. You of course chose to ignore it, so no point in either of us pretending like YOU care about evidence. Goodbye, zombie liar.

+1 Thanks, DB. I grew up poor and realized one day that had one advantage: I never felt ashamed about it. I saw my parents and our neighbors work like dogs but get barely anywhere, so how could poverty be our fault? Our "shame"? Clearly other factors were at work. So I've never understood...

Bill Maher came up with the perfect name for people like jem: zombie liars. A zombie lie is a lie that has been killed by exposure to the facts but it keeps being raised from the dead like a zombie by shameless perpetrators like jem. I don't think engaging these zombie liars goes...

The Russian rebels have SAMs. That is a verified fact. They've shot down other aircraft. Where the fuck do you think they got them from ... EBay?

No doubt they have a set script already written. Just waiting for the go-ahead from Murdock.

As well as the complete moron (Putin) who gave them SAMs. Wtf did he think was going to happen? It's like giving hand grenades to children to play stickball with.

Aye, if that one trade went from the 7-year low to the 7-year high (or vice versa for a short) that would be a serious selling point for the system. :D But I'm pretty sure the OP would have mentioned that. :p

Sad to say, I don't think there's much robustness in the OP's p&f system. One trade in 7 years using eod data is a bad omen.

Ron, I assure you that systems turned out by this mass-produced method (especially the ones they reject for themselves) are for shit. For a well-crafted homebrewed system, it's like comparing MREs to a gourmet dinner.

Then how do you explain the $700 million? Clearly somebody liked paying for it and drinking it.

You're confused on the meaning of discretionary. You can't automate discretionary. I think you mean to say you've been trading manually and you've recently automated those signals.

Bullshit.

Sooner or later the exact wrong heir gets put in charge of the family business then BOOM. Tragic.

Bingo. That's why I mentioned bull markets. You can randomize the entries or the exits, you'll make money either way. But not as much as you could make using systematic timing throughout the trades. Entries matter. Exits matter. MM matters. Everything you do in a trade matters. So randomize...

A stupid analogy. A corrupt corporation lies about a survey, therefore everybody lies about surveys. That's just braindead.

+1

This is like arguing over which leg of a three-leg stool is most important. If all three legs aren't strong legs, you don't have much of a stool. I believe the same guy showed that you could also profit from systematic entries and random exits. If not him then some other guy. There's a reason...