Search results

No, the bullshit is that the "family values" preaching is just a pose, as verified by the Republican hypocrites who refuse to live by them. retards ... or better yet, reptards ...

For whoremonger Vitter, all is forgiven by GOP: http://www.theadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2007707180306 Tough luck, Craig, you ain't one of them thar straight perverts. :D I think trying to be a Gay Republican is like trying to be a Black Klansman. You just gotta be insane...

Dude, you are just SAD. Get your skuzzy ass back to freepers! Henry Hyde: Republican member of the US House of Representatives, 1975 to 2007 adultery revealed: 1998 Newt Gingrich: GOP Presidential candidate, 2008 wiki: "In 1997 a strong majority of Americans believed Gingrich...

Fox Noise should have their news license yanked, if there is such a thing. They prove time and again that they are nothing but a propaganda outlet for the GOP.

Dude, you're just SAD. The head of the Democratic Party is Howard Dean. Nancy Pelosi is the Speaker of the House. There are no Senators in the House of Representatives. Larry Craig is a US Senator. Your homework assignment is to figure out who the Leader of the Senate is, and what...

LOL

"It depends on what the [value] of the [parameter 'n'] is." :D I've been careful to always state that I was presenting an approximation of the optimal trading fraction.

I think the OP wants to see some badass GARCH mojo. :D :D

Yep, a lot of people here want to trade with little or no math at all. Better yet, with numerology: fibonacci nonsense ad nauseum. "Use the Force, Luke, use the Force!" :D

Man, it's gotta be tough being an ignorant Republican apologist :D Because it was with a COP! The cop wasn't going let some old nasty toilet troll pull his trousers down. :D The Senate doesn't impeach. What you said is like expecting the judge to indict a defendant after he was already...

Good find.

What makes you assume there's no connection between risk management and maximization of profit? Instead of just singing the praises of Ralph Vince nonstop, why not demonstrate it by applying it to Example 2? I don't feel like looking up Vince's method when it appears to be nothing but a...

"After you've blah blah blah, maybe I'll listen to you." What makes you ASSume I haven't done all that, the only thing you know about me is that I've been here two years longer than you have, yet you have the gall to tell me to go back to Kos. Why don't YOU go back to freepers? Nice try...

Looks like another slow thinker needs to be led by the hand. Gay Democrats are openly gay; they don't have to skulk around in public bathrooms looking for sex. Gay Republicans are mostly still closeted; they are the self-hating assholes who are overtly anti-gay to portray how "righteous"...

I didn't say "expected return over expected return squared". Read the original post. It's all right there, plain as day.

It's not an indicator. This forum is Trade Management, not Technical Analysis.

If you look at the formula in the OP it doesn't 'care' what the actual values of R1, R2, etc. are. They can be big or small, positive or negative. A number approximating optimality is coming out regardless. Look at Example 2 in the OP. The risk is FIVE times your Kelly fraction...

I'm not Ralph Vince. And I can assure you that John Kelly did not consult with Ralph Vince before writing his seminal article. If you want to understand the Kelly formula and you don't trust my presentation of it, go directly to Kelly, not to some other interpreter like Vince or Ryan Jones...

I explained that in the original post. Which part is unclear to you?

BWAAAHAHAHAHAAAAAA !!! Thanks, ProfLogic, this post made my day. :D I should've guessed some little bitch claiming to be a genius ("IQ of 158") couldn't make even 4% gain in 2 years. 11 name changes! ROTFLMAO ET is funnier than any comedy club I've ever been to. :D :D