Search results

This thread is in a way a continuation of my previous thread in this forum which has been closed to prevent the reappearance of trolls who posted during the new format. Thanks for the great timing, guys. :D That thread got me to thinking about what an ATS is really worth, but in...

Great post, but I would add the following. 4- Quant forums, which are consumed with market-neutral strategies: pairs trading, stat arb, options, swaps, swaptions, all manner of weird derivatives. Elsewhere they are trying to model price behavior with the most esoteric math ever foolishly...

+1

+1

Why should anyone ever take you seriously when you dismiss Andrew Lo's excellent academic validation of TA as "flawed" with no evidence of your own?

LOL Are you drunk? Cornix is talking about Maestro's lost thread from the reconversion, not this butt-ugly retread anti-TA thread. :D

Bingo. Surf has an awful habit of ignoring or ridiculing reasonable questions that he doesn't want to deal with. It's his problem, not the problem of his critics.

I think you mean restart his thread. The original is gone. And given the fact that he has not quit this website like he promised to do if his thread could not be recovered, it seems a restart is likely.

Haskell is a programming language.

Sarcasm instead of a straight answer, surf? Please explain why we can't see your PD backtest results when you insist on seeing TA performance results before you'll accept TA as valid. I'm not asking for your secret sauce, just the initial conditions and the output performance of PD. What's...

Why do you keep ignoring questions from others but expect us to answer yours? Weird. My main point: why not present the >1000-trades backtest results for Price Drivers? Once you've posted them, you can just link to them in this thread or any future anti-TA thread you post to. Easy, peasy...

Good ol' TT, we can always count on you to be an asshole.

But you care very much whether we believe you about TA or you wouldn't keep starting these anti-TA threads. Or even posting to other members' TA threads to warn of the pitfalls of TA. How do you explain that discrepancy, surf?

You DEMAND proof of TA from others saying you'll accept nothing less than 1000 trades of profitability before you'll accept the TA but now we're just supposed to take your word that PD works with no similar performance stats? Wow.

We're going to hold you to your own standard, surf. We need to see at least 1000 trades based on your price drivers before we can make a judgment. So how's progress going on your 1000 trades? How many trades so far?

Incorrect, there is a Holy Grail but it's a very safe bet that Phil the Rage Machine doesn't have it.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavy-tailed_distribution Thread Closed At The Request of Original Poster - Admin Joe

Wow, I wasn't expecting a full price formula, maybe just some factors based on the attributes you discussed. Congrats! :cool:

Thanks. :)